arXiv Machine Learning

Conformal Anomaly Detection in Python: Moving Beyond Heuristic Thresholds with nonconform

arXiv:2605. 13642v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Most anomaly detection systems output scores rather than calibrated decisions, leaving practitioners to choose thresholds heuristically and without clear statistical interpretation.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 30

Early Failure Prediction from Near-Anomaly Detection: A Proactive Approach

arXiv:2607. 26704v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Anomaly detection methods often have uncertain behavior with respect to samples near the distribution boundary, limiting their ability to anticipate future anomalies.

By L\'ea Billet (LAAS, INSA Toulouse, ANITI), Louise Trav\'e-Massuy\`es (LAAS-DISCO, Comue de Toulouse, ANITI), Elodie Chanthery (LAAS), Alexandre Gaffet
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 21

FAME: Failure-Aware Mixture-of-Experts for Message-Level Log Anomaly Detection

arXiv:2605. 22779v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Production systems generate millions of log lines daily, yet most anomaly detectors operate at the session or window-level, flagging groups of lines rather than identifying the specific message responsible.

By Huanchi Wang, Zihang Huang, Yifang Tian, Kristina Dzeparoska, Hans-Arno Jacobsen, Alberto Leon-Garcia