arXiv:2609.27362v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Anomalies are rare, and anomalous data are often unavailable during development, making it difficult to determine which anomaly detection models and co...
By Kevin Wilkinghoff, Zheng-Hua Tan
arXiv:2607. 20530v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Semi-supervised anomaly detection plays a key role in diverse fields such as process monitoring, healthcare, and finance.
By L\'ea Billet (LAAS, INSA Toulouse, ANITI), Louise Trav\'e-Massuy\`es (LAAS-DISCO, Comue de Toulouse, ANITI), Elodie Chanthery (LAAS), Alexandre Gaffet
arXiv:2608. 13652v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generic event-level anomaly detection for collider physics has two recurring problems: anomaly scores are hard to interpret, and they correlate strongly with energy scale and object multiplicity.
By Haoyi Jia, Sagar Addepalli, Julia Gonski
GLASS is a graph‑level anomaly detection framework that aligns graph and language representations on a unit hypersphere to achieve cross‑domain transferability. It constructs a Graph Descriptor Prompt to encode local, global, and semantic graph properties, and uses a multi‑slice soft cosine objective to unify graph and text embeddings. Anomaly scoring is performed via spherical density estimation with von Mises‑Fisher kernels, enabling zero‑shot detection and few‑shot adaptation across twelve benchmarks and three meta‑domains, outperforming recent GLAD baselines.
By Xudong Wang, Chris Ding, Tongxin Li, Jicong Fan
arXiv:2604. 13924v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Time-series anomaly detection (TSAD) is critical in domains such as industrial monitoring, healthcare, and cybersecurity, but it remains challenging due to rare and heterogeneous anomalies and the scarcity of labelled data.
By Romain Hermary, Samet Hicsonmez, Dan Pineau, Abd El Rahman Shabayek, Djamila Aouada
DIFFINT is a reconstruction‑based anomaly detector that uses a differentiable autoencoder with a latent bottleneck composed of soft, axis‑aligned interval memberships. Each latent unit represents a human‑readable hyper‑rectangle in feature space, allowing the model to encode how strongly an instance falls inside each interval and to compute reconstruction error as the anomaly score. The method provides a certified lower bound on reconstruction error for points outside all active intervals, a suppression mechanism for sparse abnormalities, and a closed‑form, label‑free importance ranking for each (unit, feature) pair, achieving top performance on 48 ADBench benchmarks against 22 baselines.
By Lamine Diop, Marc Plantevit