arXiv:2606. 18451v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Single-image-to-3D generators are improving quickly, but there is no agreed, human-free way to tell whether one generated mesh is better than another.
By Ali Asaria, Tony Salomone, Deep Gandhi
arXiv:2608. 04190v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deploying pre-trained perception models in novel environments degrades their accuracy under distributional shift, and assembling them alone does not recover it: combiners such as majority voting trade recall for precision and are brittle to coordinated failures.
By Mario Leiva, Yue Ma, Qinru Qiu, Gerardo Simari, Paulo Shakarian
The paper investigates an output‑selection bottleneck in frozen DETR‑family segmentation models, showing that many useful mask proposals are computed but never exposed. A lightweight selector called HYDRA, trained only on cached outputs, can recover up to +7.41 mIoU on ADE20k and COCO and +9.4 class‑macro prompt‑IoU on SAM 3 across eight domains by selectively choosing better candidates. The study demonstrates that evaluating segmenters should consider both exposed masks and the hidden candidates they suppress.
By Ignacio M. De la Jara, Cristian Rodriguez-Opazo, Damith Ranasinghe
The paper investigates whether panels of vision‑language models (VLMs) can reliably judge image aesthetics. It shows that a panel of holistic judges rarely outperforms its best member, but when each model scores images on five rubric‑defined dimensions and these dimension scores are fused across model families, the panel consistently beats the best single VLM on two datasets (EVA and PARA). The study demonstrates that the value of a panel depends on the type of input it receives, and that dimension‑based fusion yields measurable gains at the cost of additional labeling and API usage.
By Amit Jadhav, Shaurya Beriwala, Beomjin Kim
arXiv:2608. 09101v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Semantic segmentation models are trained and evaluated against human-drawn masks, yet remote-sensing annotations are often coarse, incomplete, or misaligned; high overlap scores may then reflect agreement with imperfect labels rather than faithfulness to the image, creating an evaluation paradox.
By Shuaishuai Cao, Shuwei Peng, Meng Tang, Min Huang, Youjin Wang, Jie Chen, Jing Ouyang, Zhiwei Zhai
arXiv:2608. 16198v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Dermatology models face distribution shifts in teledermatology settings, where submitted images differ from the training data in lighting, angle, distance, focus, and framing.
By Fabian Gr\"oger, Marco Weishaupt, Philippe Gottfrois, Simone Lionetti, Linda Wermelinger, Nipun Ranasekara, Ludovic Amruthalingam, Alexander A. Navarini, Marc Pouly
arXiv:2608.21098v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Fusing prior knowledge with data-driven learning is attractive where data is scarce, yet no controlled account says when it helps, is redundant, or har...
By Ahmad AlMughrabi, Albert Clop, Benjamin Busam, Ricardo Marques, Petia Radeva
The paper investigates the blending ratio used in few‑shot adaptation of vision‑language models, which combines a zero‑shot text prototype with the mean of labeled image features. It shows that the theoretically optimal ratio—derived from a closed‑form mean‑squared error minimizer—does not align with the ratio that actually maximizes performance, falling short by an average of 8.5 points. Moreover, a leave‑one‑out estimate on the support set achieves near‑oracle performance, and validation‑free linear probes outperform even oracle‑tuned blends, indicating that the hyperparameter can be set near‑optimally without external validation data.
By Liangzhi Li, Bowen Wang, Yiming Qian, Thorsten Neumann, Xia Xie, Guangshun Li
arXiv:2609.04381v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: A scan supplies labeled images and a geometric reference. We separate their contributions in a recognizer whose scan-derived prototype matrix...
By Chenxi Tao, Hong-In Won, Seung-Kyum Choi
The paper investigates how much semantic information is lost when frozen foundation models are combined for few‑shot 3D segmentation. By varying the number of retained semantic alternatives before fusion, the authors show that keeping the full distribution of class scores yields higher harmonic‑mean IoU than collapsing to a single class. Experiments on ScanNet200 and ScanNet++ confirm that full‑distribution fusion consistently outperforms top‑1 and other operators, and that most useful information is recovered by retaining a compact set of plausible alternatives.
By Silas Kwabla Gah, Ebenezer Owusu
arXiv:2607.18451v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: A foundation encoder is pretrained once on a large image corpus and then reused with its weights frozen. Each new task is solved by training a smal...
By Soroosh Tayebi Arasteh, Sven Nebelung, Daniel Truhn
arXiv:2609.09417v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) show promise for agricultural classification, but zero-shot performance on disease, pest, damage, quality, and species id...
By Earl Ranario, Jared Smith, Lars Lundqvist, Urmil Jatin Chandarana