The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
arXiv:2607. 16888v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deploying a medical imaging model that must later accommodate a modality it has never seen is a recurring practical problem: retraining the shared representation is expensive and destroys performance on the modalities already in service.
arXiv:2608.21386v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Given a task described by a few examples, how should a model be specialized to it? Four mechanisms are available -- zero-shot, in-context attention,...
arXiv:2607. 12735v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Companion work showed the grokking delay is causally the time to form task-structured representations, injectable via a contrastive prior.
Vision--language models can identify the correct referent while returning an imprecise bounding box. We study whether a frozen direct-answer model can use its own prediction to allocate one additional localized observation without accessing target annotations at inference.
Inference efficiency is typically pursued by shrinking the model: distillation, pruning, quantization, and sparse routing each lower per-token cost while treating token count as fixed. But output length has been inflating, and it is precisely the component the standard toolkit leaves untouched.
The paper investigates how new concepts can be integrated into unified multimodal models (UMMs) by separating generation and understanding objectives through a novel visual entity bound to a single task direction. Experiments show that the effectiveness of cross‑task usability depends on where the concept is injected into the shared computation, with a mid‑stack alignment objective achieving high concept acquisition with minimal loss to overall performance. The study highlights that unified weights alone are insufficient; the two directions must share a semantic format at the entry point for efficient concept integration.