arXiv Computer Vision

DeicticVLA: Unifying Instruction Modes Based on Language and Deictic Gestures in a Single VLA

DeicticVLA unifies three instruction modes—Language Instruction, Vision‑Language Instruction, and Visual Instruction—into a single text prompt and deictic mask framework, allowing a single pretrained Vision‑Language‑Action model to handle all modes. The approach uses text‑prompt completion and deictic gesture grounding, and evaluates various visual prompting methods and training strategies in simulation and real‑world tasks. Results show that two‑stage training improves deictic mask usage, and that Vision‑Language and Visual Instruction outperform Language Instruction on unseen expressions, appearance changes, and novel objects, achieving 100% success on unseen categories.

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 11

Prompting with Sign Parameters for Low-resource Sign Language Instruction Generation

The paper introduces BdSLIG, the first Bengali Sign Language Instruction Generation dataset, aimed at evaluating Vision Language Models on under-resourced SLIG tasks and long-tail visual concepts. It proposes Sign Parameter-Infused (SPI) prompting, which embeds standard sign parameters such as hand shape, motion, and orientation into textual prompts to improve zero-shot performance and produce more structured, reproducible instructions. The work seeks to promote inclusivity and advance sign language learning systems for under-resourced communities.

By Md Tariquzzaman, Md Farhan Ishmam, Saiyma Sittul Muna, Md Kamrul Hasan, Hasan Mahmud
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 11

Learning What to Say to Your VLA: Mostly Harmless Vision Language Action Model Steering

arXiv:2606. 12299v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models provide a natural language interface to robot control, but the mapping from language to behavior is often brittle and unintuitive: semantically similar instructions can induce drastically different behaviors, while some capabilities may not be elicitable through prompting alone.

By Hyun Joe Jeong, Gokul Swamy, Andrea Bajcsy
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 16

Do VLAs Really Follow Instructions? Diagnosing How-Level Instruction Following in Vision-Language-Action Models

The paper investigates whether vision‑language‑action (VLA) models truly follow How‑level instructions that detail how to perform a task. The authors find that current VLAs do not benefit from such instructions and that task success actually decreases. They propose training with segment‑level enriched instructions and a new benchmark, SIMPLER‑IN, to better assess How‑level instruction following, but conclude that this remains an open challenge.

By Sangwu Park, Wonjoong Kim, Yeonjun In, Chanyoung Park
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 16

V-GIFT: Boosting Visual Instruction Tuning with Self-Supervised Guidance

The paper introduces V‑GIFT, a lightweight method that enhances visual instruction tuning for multimodal large language models by incorporating a small set of visually grounded self‑supervised tasks expressed as natural language instructions. These tasks—such as rotation prediction, color matching, and cross‑view correspondence—are reformulated into image‑instruction‑response triplets, providing supervision that cannot be solved without visual evidence. The approach requires no human annotations, architectural changes, or extra training stages, and consistently improves vision‑centric performance across various models, regimes, and benchmarks when only 3‑10% of the training data is augmented with these instructions.

By Sophia Sirko-Galouchenko, Monika Wysoczanska, Andrei Bursuc, Nicolas Thome, Spyros Gidaris
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 29

TurboVLA: Real-Time Vision-Language-Action Model at 32 Hz on an RTX 4090 with <1 GB VRAM

Vision-language-action (VLA) models commonly adopt an LLM-centric $V \to L \to A$ pathway, where visual observations are projected into the representation space of a large language model before being decoded into robot actions. Although effective, this design incurs substantial computation and memory overhead at every policy invocation.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11

Your Model Already Knows Don't Teach It, Learn to Ask It: Soft Prompting for Few-Shot Adaptation of Vision-Language Models

The paper explores soft prompting for few‑shot object detection with vision‑language models, showing that optimizing a small number of continuous prompt tokens—especially when placed at the cross‑modal boundary and initialized from an empty space token—can match LoRA performance while training far fewer parameters. Soft prompting also avoids catastrophic forgetting, transfers to newer models, and can be verbalized into readable prompts. The study extends these findings to manipulation tasks, indicating that VLMs already contain much of the necessary knowledge for specialized domains, and the main challenge is learning how to ask for it.

By Gautam Rajendrakumar Gare, Siyi Li, Hewei Wang, Cesar Daniel Hernandez, Wei Zhao, Wolfgang M. Pauli, John Galeotti, Deva Ramanan
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 23

Watch and Learn: Teaching Visual In-Context Learning by Removing Textual Shortcuts

The paper introduces MIME, a task‑agnostic visual in‑context learning (vICL) dataset that removes textual shortcuts by omitting explicit rules linking demonstration images to answers, forcing models to infer the rule visually. Fine‑tuning vision‑language models on MIME boosts vICL accuracy by 8.1–18.0 points across three VLMs while preserving single‑image performance and improving multi‑image and text‑only in‑context learning. The authors also propose DTAD, a technique that randomly drops demonstration labels during training to encourage visual inference, achieving comparable accuracy with more consistent attention to demonstration images and outperforming frontier models on the TrueMICL benchmark.

By Nimrod Shabtay, Asaf Yehudai, Avihu Dekel, Eli Schwartz, Raja Giryes
arXiv AI
Oct 9

ActionCodec: What Makes for Good Action Tokenizers

The paper "ActionCodec: What Makes for Good Action Tokenizers" addresses the lack of design guidance for action tokenization in Vision‑Language‑Action (VLA) models. By deriving information‑theoretic principles—maximizing temporal token overlap, reducing vocabulary redundancy, boosting multimodal mutual information, and ensuring token independence—the authors propose ActionCodec, a tokenizer that improves training efficiency and VLA performance. Experiments show that a SmolVLM2‑2.2B fine‑tuned with ActionCodec reaches a 95.5 % success rate on LIBERO, rising to 97.4 % with architectural tweaks, setting a new state‑of‑the‑art for VLA models without robotics pre‑training.

By Zibin Dong, Yicheng Liu, Shiduo Zhang, Baijun Ye, Yifu Yuan, Fei Ni, Jingjing Gong, Xipeng Qiu, Hang Zhao, Yinchuan Li, Jianye Hao