arXiv AI

ACVA-Bench: Beyond Prompt Following in Abstract Concept Visualization Ability for Text-to-Image Models

The paper introduces ACVA-Bench, a benchmark designed to evaluate text‑to‑image models on their ability to visualize abstract concepts—those without fixed visual referents—across three dimensions: semantic sufficiency, representational diversity, and conceptual distinctiveness. It proposes a fine‑grained visual‑semantic evaluation method that decomposes concept semantics into verifiable questions, bypassing the need for reference images. Benchmark results reveal that current models tend to rely on a limited set of prototypical visual patterns, indicating room for improvement in diversity and distinctiveness.

arXiv AI
Sep 3

Blending Concepts: Benchmarking Visual Metaphor Generation in Text-to-Image Models

The paper introduces VMetaphor-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating visual metaphor generation in text-to-image models, comprising 1,500 curated metaphors across three levels and ten categories, each paired with two prompts of varying specificity. It proposes a hybrid evaluation framework using a multiple-choice question protocol and dimension-based scoring to assess metaphorical fidelity. Experiments on 11 T2I models show that even top proprietary models struggle with compositional structuring and cross-domain mapping, underscoring the need for further research in this area.

By Chuer Chen, Zichen Wang, Yi He, Zhengxi Yu, Nan Cao
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 2

Blending Concepts: Benchmarking Visual Metaphor Generation in Text-to-Image Models

The paper introduces VMetaphor-Bench, a benchmark for assessing visual metaphor generation in text-to-image models. It contains 1,500 curated metaphors across three levels and ten categories, each paired with two prompts of varying specificity. The authors evaluate 11 T2I models using a hybrid MLLM-as-judge framework that combines a large multiple-choice question set with dimension-based scoring, finding that even top proprietary models struggle with compositional structuring and cross-domain mapping.

arXiv AI
Oct 2

PRISM: A Category-Theoretic Framework for Measuring and Refining Multimodal Analogies

PRISM is a modality‑agnostic, category‑theoretic framework that measures and refines multimodal analogies by representing them as explicit relational mappings. It introduces a pullback score to quantify relational alignment and an iterative refinement loop that uses this score as feedback to improve generated images. On the AnaloBench benchmark, PRISM’s pullback score alone achieves 82.5% accuracy, and human evaluations show a 57.65% preference for refined outputs, though refinement may sometimes favor visually crowded compositions.

By Mirella Zeisler, Ojas Shirekar, Mircea Lic\v{a}, Chirag Raman
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 18

Redemption Score: A Multi-Modal Evaluation Framework for Image Captioning via Distributional, Perceptual, and Linguistic Signal Triangulation

The paper introduces Redemption Score (RS), a multi‑modal evaluation framework for image captioning that combines three complementary signals: Mutual Information Divergence for global image‑text alignment, DINO‑based perceptual similarity of cycle‑generated images for visual grounding, and LLM text embeddings for contextual similarity to human references. RS fuses these signals to provide a more holistic assessment, achieving a Kendall‑τ of 58.42 on Flickr8k and outperforming most prior methods. The framework demonstrates consistent performance across Conceptual Captions and MS COCO, offering a robust evaluation that captures both visual accuracy and text quality.

By Ashim Dahal, Ankit Ghimire, Saydul Akbar Murad, Nick Rahimi
arXiv AI
Sep 28

Beyond Bag-of-Words: Diagnosing Compositional Binding Failures in Vision-Language Models

The paper introduces Auto-Comp, a fully automated, concept-driven pipeline that generates photorealistic compositional benchmarks for vision‑language models. Auto‑Comp creates paired Minimal and Contextual samples for each concept, enabling isolation of core binding abilities from visio‑linguistic complexity. Evaluations across 25 models reveal consistent failures in attribute and relational binding, with context helping relational tasks but hindering attribute tasks due to visual clutter.

By Cristian Sbrolli, Toshihiko Yamasaki, Matteo Matteucci
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 12

Do You See What You Draw? A Semantic Closed-Loop Framework for Holistic Evaluation of Unified Multimodal Models

As Large Vision-Language Models increasingly aim to integrate visual generation and understanding within a single parameter space, evaluating such structural unification in a cohesive manner remains a critical challenge. Current evaluation protocols predominantly treat generative and discriminative capabilities as separate tasks, leaving a gap in system-level evaluation for unified multimodal models (UMMs).

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 19

Domain-specific language alignment of multimodal embeddings towards explainable predictions

The paper introduces a framework that aligns multimodal embeddings with language by using captioning functions on interpretable auxiliary data, a soft contrastive loss, and a rank-based concept retrieval task. Applied to Earth observation embeddings, the method improves species distribution modelling, achieving state‑of‑the‑art performance on most metrics and better concept retrieval than prior vision‑language models. The aligned concepts enable recovery of species‑habitat associations and allow domain experts to interpret model predictions in natural language.

By Gabriel\.e Tij\=unaityt\.e, Thijs L. van der Plas, Mohamed-Bachir Belaid, Rob Knapen, Maciej J. Soja, Ioannis N. Athanasiadis