The paper introduces Visual Metaphor Transfer (VMT), a task that requires models to extract the abstract ‘creative essence’ from a reference image and apply it to a new target subject. It proposes a multi‑agent framework based on Conceptual Blending Theory, using a Schema Grammar to separate relational invariants from visual entities. The system includes perception, transfer, generation, and diagnostic agents, and experimental results show it outperforms state‑of‑the‑art baselines in metaphor consistency, analogy appropriateness, and visual creativity.
By Yu Xu, Yuxin Zhang, Lin Gao, Oliver Deussen, Tong-Yee Lee, Fan Tang
The paper introduces VMetaphor-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating visual metaphor generation in text-to-image models, comprising 1,500 curated metaphors across three levels and ten categories, each paired with two prompts of varying specificity. It proposes a hybrid evaluation framework using a multiple-choice question protocol and dimension-based scoring to assess metaphorical fidelity. Experiments on 11 T2I models show that even top proprietary models struggle with compositional structuring and cross-domain mapping, underscoring the need for further research in this area.
By Chuer Chen, Zichen Wang, Yi He, Zhengxi Yu, Nan Cao
UReason is a benchmark that evaluates how well unified multimodal models (UMMs) align textual reasoning with image generation. It contains 2,000 human‑curated instances across five reasoning‑intensive tasks—Code, Arithmetic, Spatial, Attribute, and Text—and compares direct generation, reasoning‑guided generation, and decontextualized generation. The study finds that while reasoning‑guided generation improves over direct generation, decontextualized generation consistently outperforms it, indicating that the visual semantics in textual reasoning are not reliably reflected in the generated images.
By Cheng Yang, Chufan Shi, Bo Shui, Yaokang Wu, Muzi Tao, Huijuan Wang, Ivan Yee Lee, Yong Liu, Xuezhe Ma, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick
The paper introduces VMetaphor-Bench, a benchmark for assessing visual metaphor generation in text-to-image models. It contains 1,500 curated metaphors across three levels and ten categories, each paired with two prompts of varying specificity. The authors evaluate 11 T2I models using a hybrid MLLM-as-judge framework that combines a large multiple-choice question set with dimension-based scoring, finding that even top proprietary models struggle with compositional structuring and cross-domain mapping.
arXiv:2603. 27958v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Analogical reasoning tests a fundamental aspect of human cognition: mapping the relation from one pair of objects to another.
By Yongkang Du, Xiaohan Zou, Minhao Cheng, Lu Lin
Similes provide a compact and expressive way to describe visual characteristics in text prompts. Recent text-to-image models (t2i models) can produce visually compelling outputs from simile prompts, yet even frontier models frequently misinterpret the metaphorical vehicle and confuse it with the object.