The paper investigates how shared community affiliations, measured via Bluesky starter packs, correlate with common ground between users. By analyzing 191,648 user pairs, it finds that lexical similarity—used as a proxy for common ground—increases monotonically with the number of shared starter packs, especially when those packs represent distinct topical communities. The study also shows that this effect is independent of network proximity, indicating that community membership is a distinct, measurable carrier of common ground.
arXiv:2606. 06027v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Community-conditioned language model adaptation requires choices about data collection, community definition, and evaluation that are currently made independently in each study, making it hard to compare assumptions or reuse artifacts.
arXiv:2605.27388v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as proxies for computational social analysis, yet faithfully representing the "thick description...
The study examines how intergroup identity—specifically shared gender or age—affects commenters’ social judgments and empathy in the r/AmITheAsshole subreddit. Analyzing 126,716 comments on 36,163 posts, the authors find that ingroup commenters are more likely to give a ‘Not the Asshole’ verdict and display greater text-based understanding, as measured by large language models. The research also notes age differences among commenters and shows that the ingroup effect is moderated by the relationship between the poster and another party mentioned in the conflict.
The paper reports the first large‑scale empirical comparison of AI‑agent and human online communities, analyzing 73,899 Moltbook and 189,838 Reddit posts across five matched communities. It finds that Moltbook shows extreme participation inequality (Gini = 0.84 vs. 0.47) and high cross‑community author overlap (33.8% vs. 0.5%). Linguistically, AI‑generated content is emotionally flattened, more assertive than exploratory, and socially detached, leading to community‑level homogenization that is largely a structural artifact of shared authorship. At the individual level, AI agents are more identifiable than human users due to outlier stylistic profiles amplified by their extreme posting volume.
The paper investigates how internet slang spreads across Reddit communities by combining social network analysis with linguistic context. Using large language models as scalable annotators, the authors create a benchmark for detecting slang usage and then model its adoption and diffusion. Findings reveal that users with higher bridging capital promote slang spread, while those with higher bonding capital hinder it, and that broader contextual usage delays new user adoption.
The study examines how the release of ChatGPT-3.5 affected collective knowledge on Stack Overflow, analyzing over two million questions from 2020 to 2025. It finds that easy questions declined sharply while difficult ones increased, with rising code complexity. Data-rich topics lost share of questions, whereas data-scarce ones gained, and these patterns held across multiple programming languages.
Adoption and diffusion of neologisms in online communities have received renewed attention in recent years. As internet slang terms such as APT, referring to a K-pop song, and phrases such as Canon Ev...
arXiv:2606. 01783v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Digital platforms increasingly operate as isolated information silos, limiting their ability to construct comprehensive user representations across domains.
arXiv:2604.11312v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models are increasingly deployed as interacting agents in settings such as online platforms, recommendation systems, and multi...
The Illinois Social Attitudes Aggregate Corpus (ISAAC) is an open, modular corpus comprising over 527 million English‑language Reddit posts from 2007 to 2023, curated for relevance to six social group distinctions—race, sexuality, age, ability, body weight, and skin tone. A multi‑step, human‑audited filtering pipeline keeps irrelevant content below 10% overall and per group, while each post receives algorithmic annotations of user home region and a suite of validated semantic labels such as moralization, sentiment, emotion, and linguistic generalization. ISAAC’s publicly available, reproducible pipeline enables cross‑category comparisons, high‑precision tracking of long‑term temporal shifts, and spatial mapping of public opinion and policy outcomes, and can be extended to new platforms, languages, and social categories via both point‑and‑click and programmatic interfaces.
arXiv:2603.18822v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: What is known about the values of national populations rests almost entirely on questionnaires, which prompt respondents to rate researcher-supplie...
arXiv:2606. 19625v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We use training-data attribution as an interpretable tool for capability discovery, mapping which regions of the pretraining corpus support social-reasoning versus STEM-reasoning in OLMo3-7B.