← Back to all news
arXiv Machine Learning

GRAPE: Gradient Refinement and Progress-Aware Exploitation for Query-Efficient High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization

GRAPE is a two‑stage Bayesian optimization framework that first refines the local gradient posterior using a closed‑form acquisition function and then selects update directions by maximizing expected decrease conditioned on descent. The authors prove that the refinement stage monotonically reduces local uncertainty and that the progress‑aware direction converges to true steepest descent as the posterior sharpens. Empirical results show GRAPE achieves a 5.4× speedup on black‑box adversarial attacks and reduces final average regret by 3.8 log‑units on large language model prompt‑optimization tasks.

Related stories

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 15

Tree-Structured Synergy of Large Language Models and Bayesian Optimization for Efficient CASH

The paper introduces LB-MCTS, a trajectory-structured optimization framework that combines Monte Carlo Tree Search, Bayesian Optimization, and Large Language Models to address the CASH problem in AutoML. It uses a shared tree state for algorithm selection, hyperparameter refinement, and synergy between BO and LLM proposals, with a reliability-aware policy that shifts from LLM-driven to BO-driven suggestions as the surrogate model improves. Experiments on 104 AMLB datasets show that LB-MCTS consistently outperforms existing BO-based, LLM-based, and hybrid baselines.

By Beicheng Xu, Weitong Qian, Lingching Tung, Yupeng Lu, Bin Cui
llms
More like this →
arXiv Statistics ML
Oct 2

IQS-BO: In-Context Query Selection for Bayesian Optimisation

IQS-BO introduces an in‑context query selection method for Bayesian optimisation that learns to choose evaluation points via supervised learning on synthetic priors. The approach uses a Prior‑data Fitted Network (PFN) to predict, in a single forward pass, the probability that each candidate maximises the objective, thereby amortising the decision step and eliminating the need for costly surrogate refitting or acquisition maximisation. Experiments show that IQS‑BO matches or surpasses traditional Gaussian‑process‑based BO and other in‑context methods on both synthetic and real‑world benchmarks, and that a mixture prior combining GP samples with challenging function types further improves performance.

By Luca Geminiani, Nadja Klein
llmsreinforcement-learningbenchmarks
More like this →
arXiv AI
6d ago

Rethinking Bayesian Optimization for Co-Optimizing LLM Training Configurations

The paper introduces JoBS, a Bayesian optimization framework that co‑optimizes data and model configurations for large language model training without requiring full training runs at each iteration. JoBS first allocates part of the budget to train a scaling‑law‑inspired performance predictor using only a few training steps, then uses this predictor to guide subsequent BO iterations, thereby exploring many more configurations within the same budget. The authors analyze JoBS’s regret, derive optimal budget splits, and demonstrate that it outperforms both independent optimization and existing multi‑fidelity BO baselines across diverse downstream tasks.

By Zhiliang Chen, Alfred Wei Lun Leong, Shao Yong Ong, Apivich Hemachandra, Gregory Kang Ruey Lau, Chuan-Sheng Foo, Zhengyuan Liu, Nancy F. Chen, Bryan Kian Hsiang Low
llmsfine-tuning
More like this →
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2

Local Preferential Bayesian Optimization

arXiv:2606. 02351v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Bayesian optimization (BO) is a popular and effective approach for tuning expensive, noisy experiments, but requires the formulation of an explicit objective function.

By Johanna Menn, Miriam Kober, Paul Brunzema, David Stenger, Sebastian Trimpe
benchmarks
More like this →