The paper argues against using the Gaussian (squared exponential/RBF) kernel as a default in Gaussian process regression, citing its brittleness. It shows that the kernel leads to unrealistically small conditional variances, causing overconfidence in predictive uncertainty, and that this small variance induces numerical ill‑conditioning, necessitating tricks like nugget terms that alter the model. The authors attribute these issues to the kernel’s analytic, highly smooth nature and suggest that analytic stationary kernels in general should be avoided.
The monograph explores the relationships between Gaussian processes and reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces (RKHS), two widely used approaches that rely on positive definite kernels. It examines how these frameworks connect and are equivalent across key topics such as regression, interpolation, numerical integration, distributional discrepancies, statistical dependence, and Gaussian process sample path properties. By establishing a unifying perspective based on the equivalence between the Gaussian Hilbert space and the RKHS, the work aims to bridge methods developed independently by the machine learning, statistics, and numerical analysis communities.
By Motonobu Kanagawa, Philipp Hennig, Dino Sejdinovic, Bharath K. Sriperumbudur
arXiv:2512. 06143v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Despite a large corpus of recent work on scaling up Gaussian processes, a stubborn trade-off between computational speed, prediction and uncertainty quantification accuracy, and customizability persists.
By Marcus M. Noack, Mark D. Risser, Hengrui Luo, Vardaan Tekriwal, Ronald J. Pandolfi
arXiv:2510. 25599v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Regression tasks, notably in safety-critical domains, require reliable uncertainty quantification, yet the literature remains largely classification-focused.
By Christopher B\"ulte, Yusuf Sale, Gitta Kutyniok, Eyke H\"ullermeier
arXiv:2603. 16481v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Non-conservative uncertainty bounds are essential for making reliable predictions about latent functions from noisy data, and thus, a key enabler for safe learning-based control.
By Amon Lahr, Anna Scampicchio, Johannes K\"ohler, Melanie N. Zeilinger
arXiv:2605. 10285v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present a theoretically grounded Gaussian process framework that leverages neural feature maps to construct expressive kernels.
By Anthony Stephenson
arXiv:2608. 13793v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine learning (ML) has become an indispensable part of modern engineering design workflows.
By Tyler R. Johnson, Kian Ben-Jacob, Christopher P. Muller, Ramin Bostanabad
arXiv:2606. 01427v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Foundation models (FMs) have achieved substantial success in generalizing across tasks without problemspecific training or fine-tuning.
By Tyler R. Johnson, Kian Ben-Jacob, Nima Negarandeh, Oriol Vendrell-Gallart, Ramin Bostanabad
arXiv:2401. 01599v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The generalization error curve of certain kernel regression method aims at determining the exact order of generalization error with various source condition, noise level and choice of the regularization parameter rather than the minimax rate.
By Yicheng Li, Weiye Gan, Zuoqiang Shi, Qian Lin
arXiv:2603. 22050v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Supervised machine learning describes the practice of fitting a parameterized model to labeled input-output data.
By Atticus Rex, Elizabeth Qian, David Peterson
arXiv:2607. 21773v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this paper, we propose and study a robust variant of the smart predict-then-optimize approach that accounts for prediction shifts due to disturbance in the covariate feature space.
By Aakil Caunhye, Xuefei Lu, Belen Martin-Barragan
arXiv:2602. 23006v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Simulating a Gaussian process requires sampling from a high-dimensional Gaussian distribution, which scales cubically with the number of sample locations.
By Arsalan Jawaid, Abdullah Karatas, J\"org Seewig