arXiv:2512. 06143v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Despite a large corpus of recent work on scaling up Gaussian processes, a stubborn trade-off between computational speed, prediction and uncertainty quantification accuracy, and customizability persists.
By Marcus M. Noack, Mark D. Risser, Hengrui Luo, Vardaan Tekriwal, Ronald J. Pandolfi
arXiv:2603.16621v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: We propose a conjugate and calibrated Gaussian process (GP) model for multi-class classification by exploiting the geometry of the probability simp...
By Bernardo Williams, Harsha Vardhan Tetali, Arto Klami, Marcelo Hartmann
arXiv:2607. 19498v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Gaussian process (GP) modeling is widely used in computational science and engineering.
By Eric Herrison Gyamfi, Emily L. Kang, Bledar A. Konomi, Guang Lin
arXiv:2607.10735v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: We build GNet, a scalable and flexible Gaussian process network with nonparametric activation functions. The key computational contribution i...
By Mengyang Gu
The paper introduces HACK GPs, a method that treats kernel selection for Gaussian Processes as an online learning problem with expert advice. Each candidate kernel is viewed as a GP expert, and a distribution over these experts is updated online using AdaHedge based on a loss that reflects both function fit and task alignment. Two variants—Mixture of Gaussians and categorical sampling—are presented, with theoretical guarantees that the weight concentrates on the best kernel under a loss‑gap condition, and empirical results show robust performance across Bayesian optimization, level set estimation, and Bayesian active learning compared to standard kernels and simple ensembles.
By Kavin Aravindan, Mani Tej Sriram, Gautam Dasarathy, Tejas Bodas
arXiv:2511. 16340v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Efficient Gaussian process (GP) inference is critical for sequential decision-making tasks such as active learning, online prediction, and Bayesian optimization.
By Alan Yufei Dong, Jihao Andreas Lin, Jos\'e Miguel Hern\'andez-Lobato
arXiv:2602. 23006v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Simulating a Gaussian process requires sampling from a high-dimensional Gaussian distribution, which scales cubically with the number of sample locations.
By Arsalan Jawaid, Abdullah Karatas, J\"org Seewig
The paper introduces SPICE, a Python framework that reimplements three popular deep‑learning methods for Predictive Process Mining (PPM) using PyTorch. It provides a common, highly configurable base to enable reproducible and robust comparison of PPM models, addressing issues of reproducibility, transparency, and usability. The authors benchmark SPICE against the original reported metrics and fair metrics across 11 datasets.
By Oliver Stritzel, Nick H\"uhnerbein, Simon Rauch, Itzel Zarate, Lukas Fleischmann, Moike Buck, Attila Lischka, Christian Frey
arXiv:2608. 13793v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine learning (ML) has become an indispensable part of modern engineering design workflows.
By Tyler R. Johnson, Kian Ben-Jacob, Christopher P. Muller, Ramin Bostanabad
The paper introduces a framework that learns the kernel used in kernel methods through alignment, leveraging the Collaborative Learning and Inference (CLaI) approach. It demonstrates that CLaI can be interpreted as a kernel alignment process and that its inference stage is equivalent to kernel Bayes classification with Parzen-window density estimation. By replacing cosine similarity with a learned Mahalanobis distance, the authors extend CLaI to multiclass classification, achieving higher accuracy, faster convergence, and lower calibration error on datasets such as CIFAR-10, PathMNIST, and SleepEDF, while also showing connections to Gaussian processes and competitive calibration in sepsis prediction.
By Hollan Haule, Alfredo Gonzalez-Sulser, Javier Escudero
The paper introduces an adaptive multi‑resolution Gaussian process framework that achieves scalable, exact inference by constructing a naturally data‑sparse covariance matrix using basis functions anchored directly to samples. By shrinking the support domains of these basis functions, the resulting matrix has limited block sizes, ensuring sparsity and enabling efficient computation of its inverse via a sparse Cholesky algorithm. The authors demonstrate that this approach yields exact inference with training cost ≠≠ O(n log^2 n) and prediction cost ≠≠ O(log^d n), while also improving predictive uncertainties through an augmented basis function.
By Yanchuang Cao, Jun Liu, Tengchao Yu, Heng Yong
arXiv:2606. 02909v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Gradient observations can substantially improve Gaussian process (GP) surrogates, particularly in high-dimensional settings where function evaluations are expensive.
By Hyunseok Seung, Matthias Katzfuss