arXiv:2606. 07522v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We propose an unsupervised method of resolving slang, unique entities, and folklore from online communities by isolating words in the lexicon that have the highest magnitude of semantic shift.
Adoption and diffusion of neologisms in online communities have received renewed attention in recent years. As internet slang terms such as APT, referring to a K-pop song, and phrases such as Canon Ev...
The paper investigates how internet slang spreads across Reddit communities by combining social network analysis with linguistic context. Using large language models as scalable annotators, the authors create a benchmark for detecting slang usage and then model its adoption and diffusion. Findings reveal that users with higher bridging capital promote slang spread, while those with higher bonding capital hinder it, and that broader contextual usage delays new user adoption.
The BD-LSC dataset introduces a bi‑directional lexical semantic change benchmark that tracks sense gain, loss, and stability across three time periods, while the ST‑WSD dataset offers fine‑grained, instance‑level sense annotations for words that blend slang and standard usage. These resources enable systematic evaluation of diverse models—including unsupervised clustering, supervised learning, transformer‑based approaches, and large language models—on tasks such as exact sense matching and multi‑label accuracy. The evaluation shows that few‑shot GPT‑4o performs best overall, yet all systems struggle with rare slang senses, highlighting a key open challenge in the field.
arXiv:2607. 21255v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Slang is a central component of everyday language, reflecting linguistic creativity, social identity, and cultural change, yet its dy- namic and non-standard nature makes it difficult to model computationally.
The paper introduces a pipeline and conversational system that processes 22,788 YouTube transcript and comment chunks from 309 North American cities to analyze public discourse on urbanism. It combines geographic entity resolution, topic modeling, sentiment analysis, and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), and reports empirical findings on model performance, such as a Twitter-tuned RoBERTa classifier outperforming VADER and dense retrieval surpassing TF‑IDF. The study also evaluates groundedness metrics, noting limitations of BERTScore and ROUGE‑1 for short user-generated text.
The paper investigates how semantic distance and ambiguity contribute to joke humor by revisiting and extending metrics from prior work. It introduces a new symmetry metric—measuring how close the ambiguous element Z is to both X and Y—and evaluates it using two embedding models on three joke datasets, including expanded versions with paired ambiguous sentences. Although models based on these metrics performed poorly in predicting humor ratings, the symmetry metric consistently correlated with higher-rated jokes, hinting it captures a key, though not sole, property of humor.
CHRONOBERG is a temporally structured corpus of English book texts covering 250 years, curated from Project Gutenberg and enriched with temporal annotations. It enables quantification of lexical semantic change via time‑sensitive Valence‑Arousal‑Dominance analysis and the creation of historically calibrated affective lexicons. Experiments show that language models trained sequentially on CHRONOBERG struggle to encode diachronic shifts, highlighting the need for temporally aware training and evaluation pipelines.
arXiv:2608. 06589v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While large language model outputs are frequently analysed as a collective super variety termed "AI language," this chapter argues that this perspective coexists with distinct, model-specific linguistic signatures akin to human idiolects.
arXiv:2602.13194v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Humans and large language models can predict next letter or word from its prior context much better than random guessing, indicating strong r...
The paper introduces a diagnostic tool for distinguishing the use of misogynistic slurs from their mention in counter‑speech within code‑mixed Hinglish. It identifies evaluation artifacts in existing corpora, releases a 416‑item minimal‑pair contrast set that decorrelates slur presence and gendered register from labels, and proposes a pair‑consistency metric to assess model performance. Experiments show that even strong baselines struggle to consistently label counter‑speech pairs, while a large language model achieves perfect scores, indicating the benchmark measures genuine capability rather than exploitation of artifacts.
arXiv:2605.27268v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Modern Large Language Models (LLMs) are often criticized for producing repetitive and homogeneous text, despite possessing vast latent vocabu...
arXiv:2606.27314v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: To avoid moderation and surveillance on social media, some users routinely invent indirect linguistic expressions (ILE) that camouflage sensitive m...