arXiv:2607. 29064v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Police crash narratives contain information that may supplement structured crash databases, but manual review is labor-intensive and it remains unclear how well large language models (LLMs) reproduce official crash coding.
By Sudhir Bharati, Rajendra K C Khatri, Sudip Bharati
arXiv:2606. 01737v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Traffic accident liability analysis is a critical yet challenging task in intelligent transportation and legal assistance.
By Xu Li, Zedong Fu, Xinyi Li, Xun Han
Safe autonomous driving requires both rapid responses to common high-risk events and deeper reasoning over rare, extreme long-tail scenarios in traffic safety. These scenarios are severely under-represented in naturalistic driving data, and existing trajectory and language-augmented datasets seldom provide high-risk event labels, semantic annotations, and verifiable safety signals.
arXiv:2607. 07103v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Safe autonomous driving requires both rapid responses to common high-risk events and deeper reasoning over rare, extreme long-tail scenarios in traffic safety.
By Heye Huang, Jingguang Li, Zhiyuan Zhou, Paul Liang, Mingyu Wu, Kitae Jang, Jianqiang Wang
The paper presents a decision‑aware framework for predicting dementia‑related crash severity that emphasizes auditability and selective deferral. Using 4,781 Texas crash records, the authors evaluate several models—including structured, narrative, fusion, calibrated fusion, BERT‑family, and local large‑language‑model baselines—under a stratified 70/15/15 split. The leakage‑controlled Gemma model achieves the highest macro‑F1 of 0.545, while a calibrated fusion model reaches 0.522 macro‑F1 with an expected calibration error of 0.033; selective deferral further improves performance, raising macro‑F1 to 0.573 at 70% coverage and reducing severity cost to 0.577.
By Gaurab Chhetri, Anika Baitullah, Subasish Das
arXiv:2608. 04697v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Operational hazard analysis of aviation system operations must consider interactions among weather, ATC actions, airspace constraints, aircraft operations, and human factors - distinct from the functional hazard assessment applied at the aircraft-system level.
By Cristian Mascia, Roberto Pietrantuono, Daniel Rodriguez, Stefano Russo
arXiv:2603. 14841v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Road crashes remain a leading cause of preventable fatalities.
By Joyjit Roy, Samaresh Kumar Singh, Sushanta Das
arXiv:2608. 19380v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While modern autonomous driving systems excel at perception tasks such as object detection and trajectory prediction, they lack the high-level causal reasoning required to interpret traffic accidents.
By Sparsh Garg, Yi-Wen Chen, Vijay Kumar B G, Abhishek Aich
The study investigates whether a model trained on construction‑sector occupational accident narratives can accurately classify accident‑process roles in other sectors and reporting environments. Using 42,244 factual units from 6,040 construction narratives, the authors compared TF‑IDF, frozen pretrained representations, and task‑adapted pretrained models, achieving up to 85.7% balanced accuracy without retraining. The models performed consistently across metallurgy, chemistry‑plastics, and an independent company corpus, though performance varied more on the latter due to differing reporting practices.
By Aho Yapi, Pierre Latouche, Arnaud Guillin, Yan Bailly
The study evaluates how well accident‑process role classifiers trained on construction‑sector French occupational accident narratives generalize to other sectors. An expert‑annotated corpus classifies factual units into four roles—work situation, unfavourable condition, accident event, and consequence—and the classifiers are tested on unseen metallurgy, chemistry‑plastics, and company corpora without retraining. Task‑specific adaptation consistently outperforms frozen representations, achieving balanced accuracies of 85.6%–85.8% across the target domains.
By Aho Yapi, Pierre Latouche, Arnaud Guillin, Yan Bailly
PRISM (Proactive Risk Intelligence and Safety Management) is an agentic multi-model architecture designed to shift autonomous transportation safety from reactive crash avoidance to proactive, continuous risk management. It uses inverse crash‑probability modeling to transform binary crash classifiers into dynamic safety scores, and runs three specialized models—trajectory kinematics, environmental risk, and VRU interaction—coordinated by a reinforcement‑learning reasoning layer. Across 1,296 naturalistic driving scenarios, PRISM achieved a mean safety score of 68/100, classified 77.6% of situations as advisory, and flagged 3.8% as near‑misses, with 11% requiring intervention or emergency response, highlighting trajectory risk and VRU proximity as key safety factors.
By Joyjit Roy, Samaresh Kumar Singh, Sushanta Das
arXiv:2607.22494v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Collision anticipation in autonomous driving requires not only accurate early warnings but also interpretable reasoning about what risk facto...
By Zhishan Tao, Ruoyu Wang, Yucheng Wu, Enjun Du, Yilei Yuan, Sherwin Ho, Yue Su, Jinbo Su, Yi Hong