arXiv:2607. 29064v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Police crash narratives contain information that may supplement structured crash databases, but manual review is labor-intensive and it remains unclear how well large language models (LLMs) reproduce official crash coding.
By Sudhir Bharati, Rajendra K C Khatri, Sudip Bharati
arXiv:2607. 00828v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate queries, invoke tools, and construct analytical workflows.
By Jalal Mahmud, Eser Kandogan
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate queries, invoke tools, and construct analytical workflows. Although recent advances have substantially improved workflow generation and execution, the semantic information required to operationalize analytical concepts often lies beyond what is explicitly represented in database schemas and data values.
arXiv:2609.22917v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Non-technical stakeholders frequently cannot write the SQL needed to extract insights from operational databases. We built and evaluated a Text-to-SQL...
By Vigneshwar Ravi Rao, Rupesh Swarnakar, Fayeq Jeelani Syed{\dag}
arXiv:2609.15997v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Improving safety at intersections requires identifying crash mechanisms and recommending appropriate countermeasures. However, this process tradition...
By Abu Saif Md Nasim Uddin, Mohamed Abdel-Aty, Zubayer Islam, Parvez Anowar, Chenzhu Wang
The paper presents a decision‑aware framework for predicting dementia‑related crash severity that emphasizes auditability and selective deferral. Using 4,781 Texas crash records, the authors evaluate several models—including structured, narrative, fusion, calibrated fusion, BERT‑family, and local large‑language‑model baselines—under a stratified 70/15/15 split. The leakage‑controlled Gemma model achieves the highest macro‑F1 of 0.545, while a calibrated fusion model reaches 0.522 macro‑F1 with an expected calibration error of 0.033; selective deferral further improves performance, raising macro‑F1 to 0.573 at 70% coverage and reducing severity cost to 0.577.
By Gaurab Chhetri, Anika Baitullah, Subasish Das
arXiv:2610.35267v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Natural-language-to-domain-specific-language (NL-to-DSL) semantic parsing systems increasingly translate informal user descriptions into structured art...
By Liang Zhang, Beno\^{i}t Daireaux, Sergey Alyaev
arXiv:2608. 06331v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: From natural-language query interfaces to automated report generation, data analysis tools need a description of the data: the real-world entities it contains, which columns function as measures or identifiers, and how tables connect into units of analysis.
By Donna Hooshmand, Shubham Shahi, Cameron Barrie, Abhratanu Dutta, Marko Sterbentz, Harper Pack, Kristian J. Hammond
arXiv:2608. 03451v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Data agents enable natural-language analytics over organizational workspaces, where relevant evidence may be scattered across databases, structured files, long documents, and multimedia.
By Boyan Li, Zhuowen Liang, Yupeng Xie, Xiaotian Lin, Tianqi Luo, Xinyu Liu, Yizhang Zhu, Zhangyang Peng, Yuan Li, Zhengxuan Zhang, Jiayi Zhang, Nan Tang, Guoliang Li, Yuyu Luo
The paper presents a multi‑agent, persona‑driven NL2SQL framework that addresses common LLM shortcomings such as schema hallucination, syntax errors, and intent mismatch. It incorporates domain relevance detection, schema‑grounded knowledge construction, KPI‑aware SQL synthesis, syntax‑level self‑repair via sqlite feedback, and semantic consistency checking through SQL‑to‑NL reverse engineering. Evaluated on 60 queries, the system achieves 90% correctness using Mistral across seven coordinated LLM calls, demonstrating a significant improvement in reliability for high‑stakes environments.
By Anjali Vemula, Akshat Dasula
arXiv:2610.17493v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Financial Artificial Intelligence (AI) governance and model risk management (MRM) emphasize independent validation, transparency, and effective chall...
By Piyush Jha, Cruise Song, Zhengyu Li, Yatharth Sejpal
Large language models (LLMs) increasingly support science, but they can also convert hazardous scientific knowledge into actionable misuse guidance. Existing benchmarks often rely on templated queries disconnected from real-world hazards, and employ LLM-as-a-Judge paradigms without domain grounding.