arXiv:2608. 07779v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Artificial intelligence is changing the task composition of computing work faster than curricula and training typically adapt.
By Majid Memari, George Rudolph
arXiv:2606. 12424v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As generative AI and low-code workflow platforms become routine in software practice, a key educational question is whether the next generation of computer engineers will accept these tools as useful, usable, and worthy of sustained engagement.
By Aung Pyae
arXiv:2606. 14306v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Current Generative AI (GenAI) interfaces remain largely constrained to chatbox interaction, which can impose high cognitive demands on users and create substantial barriers for people with intellectual disabilities (ID), including prompt formulation difficulties, response overload, and limited mechanisms to assess information reliability.
By Virginia Francisco, Daniel Guasch, Raquel Herv\'as
arXiv:2608. 13428v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Assessing the maturity of artificial intelligence technologies is essential for investment decisions, project management, and policy monitoring, yet the available readiness frameworks are heterogeneous and difficult to apply automatically: the adaptation of Technology Readiness Levels to AI lacks AI-specific gating criteria, the Machine Learning Technology Readiness Levels presuppose access to internal process artifacts, and AI/data readiness dimension models employ scales that resist direct comparison.
By Juan Irving Vasquez, Juan Terven, Laura-Ivoone Garay-Jimenez
arXiv:2606. 00038v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy is increasingly recognized as a foundational competency for all university graduates.
By J. Paul Liu, Rachel Levy
arXiv:2412. 19754v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming the nature of work, yet there is limited empirical evidence on how it affects demand for human skills.
By Elina M\"akel\"a, Matthew Bone, Mareike Sehrer, Farah Nanji, Fabian Stephany
arXiv:2606. 19630v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The March 2020 INCOSE INSIGHT special issue on AI and Systems Engineering (SE) became the most downloaded issue in the publication's history and launched a research community that now draws over 250 registrants to its annual workshop.
By H. Sinan Bank, Daniel R. Herber, Thomas Bradley
arXiv:2505. 00100v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Background and Context.
By Ethan Dickey, Andres Bejarano, Rhianna Kuperus, B\'arbara Fagundes
The paper presents an AI-based methodology that uses embedding-based similarity search and large language model classification to map Dutch job profiles to harmonised ESCO occupations. It introduces a Digital Semantic Score, which quantifies the association of job titles and skills with digital concepts relative to a non-digital reference, moving beyond keyword-based approaches. The study finds that digitalisation is unevenly distributed across occupations, with managerial, professional, and ICT roles showing the strongest digital language, while career-transition and skill analyses reveal pathway-dependent movement toward digital work and a multidimensional nature of digital capability.
By Sadegh Shahmohammadi, Xavier Pinho, Mairi Bowdler, Suhendan Adiguzel-van Zoelen, Joost van Genabeek
The study examines how AI’s growing presence in computing affects the perceived importance of cognitive skills among students and experts. Findings suggest that most cognitive skills will become less critical in an AI‑rich future, while critical thinking remains essential. Interviews provide reasons for these shifts and offer guidance for preparing future computing students.
By Neha Rani, Vu Minh Anh Le, Austin M. Spangler, Erta Cenko
arXiv:2606. 01152v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The work of a professional software engineer has begun to consist, increasingly, of directing agents rather than writing code, and the empirical evidence for the shift is now several years deep.
By Mikael Gorsky
arXiv:2505. 10300v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Responsible AI (RAI) efforts increasingly emphasize the importance of addressing potential harms early in the AI development lifecycle through social-technical lenses.
By Muzhe Wu, Yanzhi Zhao, Shuyi Han, Michael Xieyang Liu, Hong Shen