arXiv Computer Vision

Fairness-Aware Low-Rank Representation Fine-Tuning

arXiv AI
Aug 17

Training Fair Tabular Foundation Models

arXiv:2608. 14211v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tabular Foundation Models (TFMs) have emerged as leading methods for tabular predictive tasks, leveraging in-context learning to predict on new data without task-specific training.

By Patrik Kenfack, Jesse C. Cresswell, Anthony L. Caterini, Samira Ebrahimi Kahou, Ulrich A\"ivodji
arXiv AI
Aug 19

FairNVT: Fair Classification via Noise Injection in Vision Transformers

FairNVT is a lightweight debiasing framework that injects calibrated Gaussian noise into sensitive embeddings learned by adapters for pretrained transformer-based encoders. By reducing sensitive-attribute leakage through orthogonality constraints and fairness regularization, it improves fairness metrics such as demographic parity difference and equalized odds while maintaining competitive task performance across vision and language datasets.

By Qiaoyue Tang, Sepidehsadat Hosseini, Mengyao Zhai, Thibaut Durand, Greg Mori
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 10

Let's Unlearn Stereotypes Before Decision-Making: Assessing the Impact of Intrinsic Bias Mitigation on Downstream Fairness in LLMs

arXiv:2509. 16462v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in high-stakes decision-making systems, where biased predictions can reinforce social and economic disparities.

By Mina Arzaghi, Alireza Dehghanpour Farashah, Florian Carichon, Jean-Fran\c{c}ois Plante, Golnoosh Farnadi
arXiv AI
Aug 25

Fairness-Aware Mixture-of-Experts via Subgroup Reweighting and Gate Regularization

The paper proposes a fairness-aware Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) framework that tackles routing-induced bias by applying subgroup reweighting to correct data imbalance and gate entropy regularization to prevent the gating network from collapsing onto subgroup attributes. This end-to-end approach keeps expert utilization balanced and interpretable, offering a clear view of how subgroups are allocated across experts. Experiments show that the method improves fairness while maintaining competitive predictive performance.

By Sunhee Hwang
arXiv AI
Jun 10

Is Fairness Truly Fair? Towards Reliable Lipschitz Fairness in Multi-Task Learning via Fixed-\texorpdfstring{$\delta$}{delta} Alignment

arXiv:2606. 10632v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Lipschitz-style individual fairness formalizes the idea that semantically similar examples should receive similar predictions, but its evaluation in multi-task learning (MTL) can be confounded by method-induced representation scales.

By Junbo Ding, Xin Zang, Chenchen Pan, Donghao Song, Jiaxin Zhu, Danhuai Guo
arXiv AI
Jul 1

Perturbation Effects on Robustness and Individual Fairness

arXiv:2404. 01356v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deep neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial perturbations that can simultaneously degrade prediction robustness and individual fairness across diverse application settings.

By Xuran Li, Hao Xue, Peng Wu, Xingjun Ma, Zhen Zhang, Huaming Chen, Flora D. Salim