arXiv:2503.05684v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Pre-trained foundation models can be efficiently adapted for specific tasks using Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), but the fairness properties of...
By Parameswaran Kamalaruban, Mark Anderson, Stuart Burrell, Maeve Madigan, Piotr Skalski, David Sutton
arXiv:2609.16321v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Existing fairness analysis tools predominantly operate as post-training evaluation frameworks, requiring practitioners to complete the full model dev...
By Archit Rathod, Saeid Tizpaz-Niari
arXiv:2606. 00656v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Ensuring fair and equitable treatment across diverse groups, particularly in multi-class classification tasks, poses a significant challenge due to the persistent biases inherent in machine learning models.
By Li Zhang, Yuyuan Li, XiaoHua Feng, Jiaming Zhang, Fengyuan Yu, Chaochao Chen
arXiv:2608. 14211v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tabular Foundation Models (TFMs) have emerged as leading methods for tabular predictive tasks, leveraging in-context learning to predict on new data without task-specific training.
By Patrik Kenfack, Jesse C. Cresswell, Anthony L. Caterini, Samira Ebrahimi Kahou, Ulrich A\"ivodji
FairSplit decomposes the embedding space into a Fair Space for prediction and a Sensitive Space that isolates sensitive information, using a learnable mask and the Hilbert‑Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC) to guide the separation. The method simultaneously trains for classification accuracy and independence from sensitive attributes, providing theoretical bounds on the demographic parity gap based on the Fair Space dimensionality and HSIC. It supports multiclass tasks and non‑binary sensitive attributes, achieving competitive accuracy‑fairness trade‑offs on established benchmarks.
arXiv:2604. 16610v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Machine learning models often inherit biases from historical data, raising critical concerns about fairness and accountability.
By Yixiao Lin, James Booth