arXiv AI

ARIA - An Agentic Framework for Autonomous Testing of Infotainment Systems

ARIA is a multi‑agent large‑language‑model framework that autonomously runs end‑to‑end visual tests on Android infotainment systems. From simple scenario sentences, it executes interactions, generates reproducible scripts, and produces detailed reports with visual evidence. In evaluation on a manufacturer’s device, ARIA achieved a 93.3% completion rate, correctly identified all known defects, and demonstrated lower false‑positive rates compared to a single‑agent baseline.

arXiv AI
Oct 27

Build or Adopt? Custom-Built vs. General-Purpose LLM Agent Harnesses for Automotive GUI Testing

The study compares a custom-built LLM agent harness with two general-purpose harnesses—Claude Code and OpenCode—used for testing Volvo Group’s Android-based in‑vehicle infotainment GUI. On Volvo’s stepwise IVI tests, the general-purpose harnesses achieve similar success rates but with higher inference costs, yet they reduce overall monthly costs by 3–66% due to lower engineering effort. In open‑ended public‑app tasks, the general-purpose harnesses perform better, recovering more effectively from incorrect actions.

By Arsham Gholamzadeh Khoee, Ruyu Fu, Jiaqi Wei, Ruikun Deng, Robert Feldt, Dhasarathy Parthasarathy, Yinan Yu
arXiv AI
5d ago

GUITestScape: Towards Open-set Evaluation on Exploratory GUI Testing

GUITestScape introduces an interactive benchmark for exploratory GUI testing, covering 61 Android apps and 508 defects that include both interaction and display types. It also presents GUIJudge, an open‑set evaluator that breaks down an agent’s testing trajectory into independently diagnosable capabilities, enabling process‑aware assessment beyond predefined annotations. Experiments show GUIJudge outperforms baselines, revealing detection as the main bottleneck and demonstrating that adding GUIJudge’s verifiers to existing agents improves detection without retraining.

By Xiaoyi Chen, Yifei Gao, Yang Xu, Zhenlong Wang, Jian Yan, Jiming An, Xingxing Song, Liqun Deng, Xiaojun Meng, Jiansheng Wei, Yi Zhang, Jitao Sang
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 21

RecreationWorld: Scalable and Verifiable Environments for Hybrid Computer-Use Agents

arXiv:2609.22000v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Computer-use agents (CUAs) have advanced along two separate lines: graphical interaction and software development through code and the command line. Re...

By Shuai Bai, Jiayong Deng, Yikun Fu, Chang Gao, Xuhao Hu, Mianqiu Huang, Yizhen Jiang, Yuheng Jing, Dehui Kong, Keliang Li, Ning Li, Wanli Li, Dayiheng Liu, Dunjie Lu, Changwei Luo, Que Shen, Zheyuan Wang, Zijian Wang, Jie Wu, Gao Wu, Zhihui Xie, Rui Xie, Haiyang Xu, An Yang, Jiakang Yuan, Yanming Zhang, Jiajun Zhang, Xi Zhang, Zhenru Zhang, Zhuo Zhen, Mingkang Zhu, Bowen Zhou
arXiv AI
Aug 24

Automated Trajectory Evaluation for Mobile Agents via Step-Level Consequence Reasoning and Aggregation

The paper introduces CRATE, a two‑stage vision‑language model framework that evaluates mobile agents by reasoning about each step’s consequences and aggregating this evidence to assess task completion. It also presents CRATE‑S, an extension that evaluates operational safety. Experiments show CRATE and CRATE‑S outperform existing benchmarks, achieving high F1‑scores on AndroidWorld and MobileRisk datasets.

By Pengshuai Yang, Zijing Gao, Xue Yu, Benhui Zhuang, Bo Yuan, Junlan Feng
arXiv AI
Sep 10

PlannerForge: LLM Agents for Scenario-Based Testing of Motion Planners in Autonomous Driving

PlannerForge is a unified LLM‑agent framework that covers the entire scenario‑based testing pipeline for autonomous driving systems, from scenario generation to ADS assessment, and adds ADS enhancement and benchmarking stages. It was evaluated with ten off‑the‑shelf LLMs across all tasks and five prompt conditions, achieving best‑per‑task scores between 0.88 and 1.00 and matching commercial APIs with open‑source models such as Qwen3.6:35B. The end‑to‑end chaining retains 83% of seed queries for commercial backends and 78% for open‑source, outperforming existing tools like Scenario Factory 2.0 and BM25 in natural‑language generation, attribute realization, and physically valid edits. whyItMatters":"PlannerForge demonstrates that a single LLM‑based system can streamline and improve the fragmented scenario‑based testing workflow for autonomous driving, achieving high performance without domain‑specific fine‑tuning."

By Yuan Gao, Sebastian M\"uller, Mattia Piccinini, Marc Kaufeld, Yuchen Zhang, Finn Rasmus Sch\"afer, Qunying Song, Johannes Betz
arXiv AI
Sep 10

Improving Proficiency and Efficiency of Android GUI Agents via Self-Generating Tool Actions

The paper introduces DroidTool, a framework that enables Android GUI agents to automatically generate and integrate tool actions—Python functions that manipulate application states—into their hybrid action space. DroidTool follows an agentic workflow with stages of proposal, implementation, test generation, execution, and repair, and it constructs relational tests to ensure comprehensive verification. Experiments on benchmarks such as AndroidWorld, B-MoCA, and MobileSafetyBench show that agents using DroidTool’s self-generated tools outperform GUI-only agents by about 4.47% in performance while reducing interactions by roughly 20.05%.

By Juyong Lee, Woogyeol Jin, Kimin Lee
arXiv AI
Sep 28

VLAA-GUI: Knowing When to Stop, Recover, and Search, A Modular Framework for GUI Automation

VLAA-GUI is a modular framework for autonomous GUI agents that addresses early stopping and repetitive loops by integrating three core components: a Completeness Verifier, a Loop Breaker, and an on-demand Search Agent. The framework also includes optional Coding and Grounding Agents for specialized tasks. Evaluations on five backbones across Linux and Windows benchmarks show strong performance, with some models surpassing human results and the Loop Breaker significantly reducing wasted steps.

By Qijun Han, Haoqin Tu, Zijun Wang, Haoyue Dai, Yiyang Zhou, Nancy Lau, Alvaro A. Cardenas, Yuhui Xu, Ran Xu, Caiming Xiong, Zeyu Zheng, Huaxiu Yao, Yuyin Zhou, Cihang Xie
arXiv AI
Oct 26

Trial by Trace: Benchmarking AI Agent Harnesses for Reliability and Failure Attribution

The paper introduces TraceTrial-Bench, a benchmark that evaluates the reliability of AI agent harnesses across seven components—context, execution, governance, lifecycle, observability, tools, and verification—using 95 expert-level tasks with executable or state-based ground truth. It employs a Trajectory Tracing module to record agent execution, a two-layer evaluation framework to separately assess agent performance and harness reliability, and a Multi-source Evidence Acquisition module to gather evidence for LLM-based evaluation. The benchmark’s analysis of 3,420 runs across four harnesses and nine models shows harness scores between 59.8% and 72.0%, with 31.1% of runs succeeding despite failing at least one harness criterion, highlighting the need for auditable and reproducible harness evaluation.

By Zhiyong Cao, Hengjie Zhu, Yongxin Wang, Xuchen Li, Jintao Li, Shuxia Liu, Dunqiang Liu, Bo Wang, Kairan Zhang, Cong Lin, JiangDi Yu, Siyuan Liu, Sijia Yao, Yi-Liang Wei, Lingxu Ma, Aijia Wang, Anxin Chen, Zixian Wei, Xiang Ruan, Ruizhi Xu, Ruqian Shi, Baihua Xiao, Sicheng Zhou
arXiv AI
Jul 14

AgentAbstain: Do LLM Agents Know When Not to Act?

arXiv:2607. 10059v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agent systems based on large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed for autonomous tasks, yet existing evaluations mostly focus on task success rather than whether agents know when to abstain.

By Xun Liu, Yi Evie Zhang, Vira Kasprova, Parisa Rabbani, Pardis Sadat Zahraei, Tianyu Zhang, Ali Ebrahimpour-Boroojeny, Varun Chandrasekaran