The paper investigates how large language models can extract contextualized data from scientific literature. It presents four workflows: expert‑written prompts, self‑generated prompts, autonomous literature discovery, and dataset creation from guidelines. While models perform well with prompts, they struggle with context, hallucinate references, and still need human oversight for final validation.
By Valentin Romanov, Monique Bax, Steven Niederer
arXiv:2607. 20926v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientific research involves complex information-seeking and reasoning workflows across heterogeneous sources.
By Yinhao Tang, Youqing Fang, Yanan Sun, Wenran Liu, Weiming Zhang, Bin Liu, Kuikun Liu, Wenwei Zhang, Kai Chen
arXiv:2608.28596v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly embedded in scientific workflows for literature analysis, drafting, and review. Existing systems adv...
By Nidhi Jha, Siddharth Chaudhary, Ajinkya Kulkarni
The paper introduces SGHA, a fully automated system that discovers research problems by structuring scientific literature into evidence-linked objects and a typed evidence graph. SGHA operates entirely on a local 9B open‑weight language model, avoiding proprietary frontier‑model APIs, and outputs traceable research‑problem families with assumptions, objectives, success criteria, and ambiguities. Comparative experiments in five machine‑learning domains show that SGHA’s corpus‑first, evidence‑constrained approach yields inspectable research‑problem formulation without relying on external models.
By Sarvesh Gharat, Junpei Komiyama
The study evaluates literature reviews produced by large language models (LLMs) using short and long context windows, assessing their quality across 15 dimensions. Results show that while larger context windows allow LLMs to incorporate more information and maintain coherence, they also increase repetition, omission of key works, and a tendency toward descriptive rather than synthetic content. Human oversight remains essential for meeting academic publishing standards, and the authors suggest future work should blend human expertise with AI to mitigate these limitations.
By Muhammad Ali Chaudhry, Xinyuan Hao, Haifa Alwahaby
Optimist Deep Research is an open‑source agent that conducts literature research as an iterative, state‑centric process. It breaks a research question into a tree of subquestions, uses search intents to query multiple scholarly databases, and merges results into a provenance‑preserving document registry. The agent iteratively expands the registry via citation snowballing, evaluates evidence, and refines the research plan through a critic that can add, split, rephrase, deprioritize, or close subquestions, ultimately producing a report with every citation linked to a retrieved document.
By Gihan Panapitiya
arXiv:2609.23735v2 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Scientific agents support a range of literature-based research tasks, such as retrieval, question answering, evidence-grounded generation, and claim as...
By ScholarSeed AI Team, Caoqinwei Gong, Xue Jiang, Wei Luo, Xiaoyu Qiu, Jiayi Sheng, Yi Wang, Zheng Yu, Ao Zhang, Haifan Zhang, Hanwei Zhang, Jihai Zhang, Yuan Cao, Wei Chen, Liyun Dai, Wenkai Fang, Guanglei Wang, Kai Ying, Tingyu Zhu, Wotao Yin
arXiv:2604.01452v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Scientific discovery is slowed by fragmented literature that requires excessive human effort to gather, analyze, and understand. AI tools, includin...
By Maxwell J. Jacobson, Daniel Xie, Jackson Shen, Adil Wazeer, Guang Lin, Xiao-Ying Yu, Haiyan Wang, Xinghang Zhang, Yexiang Xue
Modelpedia is an automated, LLM-assisted framework that extracts and organizes findings about AI models from published papers into a searchable public catalog. It links each finding to the relevant model, dataset, method, and concept, and has already extracted over a thousand findings from ICLR 2024 and 2025 papers. The authors invite the community to explore, contribute to, and build on this open catalog, positioning model findings as a shared foundation for the meta‑science of AI.
By Franciszek Bernat (Centre for Credible AI, Warsaw University of Technology), Dawid P{\l}udowski (Centre for Credible AI, Warsaw University of Technology), Micha{\l} Jan W{\l}odarczyk (Centre for Credible AI, Warsaw University of Technology), Luca Longo (University College Cork), Jianlong Zhou (University of Technology Sydney), Andreas Holzinger (Human-Centered AI Lab), Riccardo Guidotti (University of Pisa, ISTI-CNR), Wojciech Samek (Technical University of Berlin, Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data), Przemys{\l}aw Biecek (Centre for Credible AI, University of Warsaw)
PathAnchor is a new scientific reasoning system that uses path-structured evidence workspaces instead of independent passages or concepts. It retrieves source-linked Material‑Sensor‑Signal‑System trajectories that preserve role, direction, and supporting evidence, and a controller uses read‑only tools to search, trace, and open exact evidence before producing a claim‑cited answer. In evaluations on 120 flexible‑sensor questions, PathAnchor achieved an 82.6% score, outperformed six other systems, and improved source recall, citation completeness, and reduced tool calls compared to unordered concept graphs.
By Qiuhui Chen, Jiafan Lu, Shuaimin Tang, Tao Dai, Suyuan Wang, Chenrui Ji, Zhenglei Zhou, Weimin Zhong
arXiv:2605.30947v4 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: LLM-based research agents have advanced rapidly in science and engineering, where research is organized around executable experiments, code, and qu...
By Yating Pan, Jiajun Zhang, Jun Wang, Qi Su
Large language models are increasingly deployed in citation-augmented settings, yet the effect of citation presence on model behavior independent of factual content remains poorly understood. We introduce AuthorityBench, a 220,564-prompt multi-domain benchmark that isolates how citation-based authority signals influence epistemic behavior in LLMs.