Hugging Face Blog

Open-sourcing Knowledge Distillation Code and Weights of SD-Small and SD-Tiny

arXiv Machine Learning
6d ago

KDFP: A first-principles approach to knowledge distillation in large language models

KDFP is a new white‑box methodology for general knowledge distillation in large language models, addressing a gap left by prior work that focused mainly on post‑training abilities such as instruction following and chain‑of‑thought reasoning. The authors evaluate lessons from earlier studies and conduct new experiments to design a distillation approach tailored to modern LLMs. KDFP achieves 1.6%–4.9% higher performance across nine benchmarks and improves training efficiency by up to 99.1% through reduced temporary parameters.

By Ryan Swift, Konstantinos Psounis
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 11

Apertus LLM Family Expansion via Distillation and Quantization

arXiv:2605. 29128v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The wide adoption of LLMs has led to their use in great variety of applications and scenarios, such as chatbot assistants and data annotation, creating the need for the models to satisfy certain budget and hardware constraints.

By Andrei Panferov, Davit Melikidze, Martin Jaggi, Dan Alistarh
OpenAI Blog
Sep 30

Disrupting a coordinated model-distillation campaign

OpenAI exposed and disrupted a coordinated campaign aimed at extracting protected model reasoning through model distillation. The incident highlighted vulnerabilities in how models can be reverse‑engineered by adversaries. In response, OpenAI is enhancing its defenses to guard against future adversarial distillation attempts.

OpenAI Blog
Mar 20, 2017

Distill

We’re excited to support today’s launch of Distill, a new kind of journal aimed at excellent communication of machine learning results (novel or existing).

arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

Below the Noise Floor: Bimodal Seed Collapse and Distinct Failure Modes in Small-Model Knowledge Distillation

The study examines function routing for a 740‑instance healthcare API task using a 1.5B Qwen student and a 20B teacher, comparing eight knowledge‑distillation (KD) variants to supervised cross‑entropy across multiple random seeds. Results show high per‑seed variability (2.8–48.7 pp), with several KD methods exhibiting bimodal collapse—some seeds achieving low accuracy while others train normally—and distinct failure modes such as wrong‑function selection and output‑truncation. Only progressive_kd and rank_kd consistently avoid collapse, and a simple input‑enrichment trick that appeared beneficial in single‑seed tests actually harms performance when re‑tested with multiple seeds.

By Dipto Sumit, Sakib Ul Haque, Farig Sadeque