arXiv AI

Multimodal Auto-regressive Transformer Surrogate for Modeling Variable Operations and Quantifying Uncertainty in Geological Carbon Storage

arXiv:2608. 02629v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The use of variable well perforation and injection strategies can improve the efficiency of geological carbon storage operations.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 29

Boundary condition fidelity for bottom-hole pressure and CO2 plume prediction in geological carbon storage

arXiv:2606. 27515v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Accurate prediction of bottom-hole pressure (BHP) and CO2 plume migration is essential for safe geological carbon storage, yet practical simulations often rely on truncated domains where artificial boundaries distort pressure diffusion and CO2 saturation footprints.

By Romal Ramadhan, Seyyed A. Hosseini, Larry W. Lake
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 17

Towards Fast GNN Surrogates for CO2 Migration in Complex Geological Formations

arXiv:2606. 17180v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This chapter discusses how a data-driven machine learning approach can reproduce key aspects of the physical behavior of multiphase flows in complex geological formations.

By Rodrigo S. Luna, Thiago H. N. Coelho, Luiz S. L. Neto, Roberto M. Velho, Adriano M. A. Cortes, Renato N. Elias, Alexandre G. Evsukoff, Fernando A. Rochinha, Mauricio Araya-Polo, Herve Gross, Alvaro L. G. A. Coutinho
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 25

Surrogate models for Rock-Fluid Interaction: A Grid-Size-Invariant Approach

arXiv:2602. 22188v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Modelling rock-fluid interaction requires solving a set of partial differential equations (PDEs) to predict the flow behaviour and the reactions of the fluid with the rock on the interfaces.

By Nathalie C. Pinheiro, Donghu Guo, Hannah P. Menke, Aniket C. Joshi, Claire E. Heaney, Ahmed H. ElSheikh, Christopher C. Pain
arXiv AI
Jul 22

Now We Know? A Systematic Comparison of TerraMind and THOR

arXiv:2607. 18504v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Benchmarks for Geospatial Foundation Models (GFMs) increasingly rank models by aggregate score, but such rankings obscure why models differ: how much of the gap is architecture, how much is decoder capacity, and how much is a use-case-specific artefact?

By Frederick Schindlegger, Kenzo Bounegta, Eva Gmelich Meijling, Johannes Jakubik, Arnt-B{\o}rre Salberg, Theodor Forgaard, Nicolas Longepe, Valerio Marsocci