arXiv AI

What Should World Models Forget? Stratified Retention for Continual Adaptation

The paper argues that continual learning for world models must differentiate between knowledge that should never be revised—such as physics and object permanence—and knowledge that should be updated when the environment changes. It critiques existing forgetting metrics and benchmarks for failing to capture this distinction, and proposes a differential retention approach that tracks invariant regression testing and revision latency throughout the adaptation process.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 29

ForgetBench: Benchmarking Forgetting Dynamics of Long-Term Parametric Memory in Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in knowledge acquisition and reasoning, yet their ability to retain previously acquired knowledge under repeated updates remains insufficiently understood. Existing evaluation paradigms primarily focus on single-step reasoning or static knowledge editing, which fail to capture the temporal dynamics of knowledge retention and degradation during continual model modification.

arXiv AI
Aug 19

When to Review: Spaced Repetition for Continual Pre-Training of Language Models

The paper introduces Spaced Repetition Training (SRT), a continual learning framework that schedules sample rehearsal using the SM-2 algorithm. SRT tracks per-example review states and maps perplexity to recall quality, allowing the training loop to decide which examples to replay and when. Experiments on Wikipedia and code corpora show that SRT improves the stability‑plasticity trade‑off, recovers 5–37 percentage points of lost old‑knowledge accuracy, and preserves benchmark performance better than naive continual pre‑training or uniform replay.

By Alankar Atreya, Devesh Batra, Yoages Kumar Mantri, Geremy Bantug, Greig A Cowan, Raad Khraishi
arXiv Machine Learning
2d ago

What Must Replay Preserve? Separating Correctable Bias from Class Correspondence

The paper investigates what information must be preserved in replay buffers for class‑incremental learning. By treating cached predictions as temporally heterogeneous supervision, the authors separate classes known at storage time from those learned later, and evaluate the impact of deleting logit matching. Experiments on CIFAR‑100 with DER++ show that a simple task‑level offset can largely correct the cost of removing later‑class matching, while the cost of disrupting class correspondence remains.

By BoRen Deng, Xiangyue Ma, Chenglong Li, Xiaoting Du
arXiv AI
Aug 11

Beyond Static Models: An Evolving Framework for Continual Learning in Large Language Models across Training Stages

arXiv:2603. 12658v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Continual learning (CL) has emerged as a pivotal paradigm to enable large language models (LLMs) to dynamically adapt to evolving knowledge and sequential tasks while mitigating catastrophic forgetting, a critical limitation of the static pre-training paradigm inherent to modern LLMs.

By Hongyang Chen, Zhongwu Sun, Hongfei Ye, Kunchi Li, Xuemin Lin
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 18

When to Review: Spaced Repetition for Continual Pre-Training of Language Models

The paper introduces Spaced Repetition Training (SRT), a continual learning framework that adapts review scheduling for language models by using the SM-2 algorithm to decide which past examples to replay. SRT tracks per-example review states and maps perplexity to a recall-quality signal, allowing the model to retain old knowledge while consolidating new information without changing the underlying model or training objective. Experiments on Wikipedia and code corpora show that SRT improves the stability-plasticity trade‑off, recovers 5–37 percentage points of lost accuracy, and maintains benchmark performance better than naive continual pre‑training or uniform replay; similar benefits are observed in vision and tabular data when an appropriate recall signal is used.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 15

Realistic Continual Learning Approach using Pre-trained Models

arXiv:2404.07729v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Continual learning (CL) evaluates adaptability in learning solutions to retain knowledge. Our research addresses the challenge of catastrophic forg...

By Nadia Nasri, Carlos Guti\'errez-\'Alvarez, Sergio Lafuente-Arroyo, Saturnino Maldonado-Basc\'on, Roberto J. L\'opez-Sastre