arXiv Machine Learning

What Must Replay Preserve? Separating Correctable Bias from Class Correspondence

The paper investigates what information must be preserved in replay buffers for class‑incremental learning. By treating cached predictions as temporally heterogeneous supervision, the authors separate classes known at storage time from those learned later, and evaluate the impact of deleting logit matching. Experiments on CIFAR‑100 with DER++ show that a simple task‑level offset can largely correct the cost of removing later‑class matching, while the cost of disrupting class correspondence remains.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 3

Source-Free Class Relearning: Diagnosing Forgetting in Class Unlearning

The paper investigates whether a model that has undergone class unlearning can still recover forgotten classes without access to original data. It introduces a white‑box audit method that generates synthetic probes in representation space, filters them by confidence, and relabels boundary‑adjacent probes as the forgotten class. The authors define a Relearning Score to quantify recovery while preserving retain performance, and demonstrate that several unlearning techniques on CIFAR‑10, CIFAR‑100, and TinyImageNet can be fully recovered in a source‑free setting, sometimes even outperforming a retrained reference.

By Zahra Dehghani, Pablo Piantanida, Mohammadhadi Shateri
arXiv AI
Jun 16

When Generator Replay Degrades: Projected Rehearsal Orchestration for Heterogeneous Federated Class-Incremental Learning

arXiv:2606. 15695v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated class-incremental learning (FCIL) becomes substantially harder when clients observe different label subsets, progress through tasks at different stages, and provide uneven supervision for the same semantic concepts.

By Thinh T. H. Nguyen, Khoa D. Doan, Binh T. Nguyen, Danh Le-Phuoc, Kok-Seng Wong
arXiv AI
Jun 3

PURGE: Projected Unlearning via Retain-Guided Erasure

arXiv:2606. 03808v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We propose PURGE, a machine unlearning algorithm built on a simple but an under-exploited observation: continual learning (CL) and machine unlearning (MU) which are fundamentally dual problems.

By Vedant Jawandhia, Daksh Ahuja, Ghufran Alam Siddiqui, Prashant Trivedi, Yash Sinha, Pratik Narang
arXiv AI
Sep 16

ReDraft, Don't Just Distill: Reference-Driven Revision for Continual VLLM Post-Training

ReDraft is a reference‑driven revision method for continual post‑training of large multimodal language models. It uses the model’s own incorrect outputs as references, revises them, verifies the revisions, and fine‑tunes on the accepted ones, thereby combining explicit supervision with policy proximity. On tasks such as Counting, Clock Reading, and Jigsaw, ReDraft outperforms standard supervised fine‑tuning and on‑policy methods, achieving higher target‑task gains while dramatically reducing forgetting.

By Zhihao Zhang, Mingqi Wu, Qiaole Dong, Enyu Zhou, Shuo Li, Boyang Liu, Jiazheng Zhang, Honglin Guo, Xin Guo, Shaofan Liu, Junzhe Wang, Dingwei Zhu, Zhiheng Xi, Minlong Peng, Yuan Hua, Qi Zhang, Tao Gui, Xuanjing Huang