arXiv:2603. 12658v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Continual learning (CL) has emerged as a pivotal paradigm to enable large language models (LLMs) to dynamically adapt to evolving knowledge and sequential tasks while mitigating catastrophic forgetting, a critical limitation of the static pre-training paradigm inherent to modern LLMs.
By Hongyang Chen, Zhongwu Sun, Hongfei Ye, Kunchi Li, Xuemin Lin
arXiv:2607. 07847v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly capable, the next question is how can we enable models to continually learn?
By Anne Harrington, Nayan Saxena, Michael Murphy, Anastasia Borovykh, Zeyu Yun, Sridhar Kamath, Ara Eindra Kyi, Trevor Darrell, Jitendra Malik, Yutong Bai
arXiv:2511. 20892v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) often produce incorrect or outdated content after being employed.
By Xuyuan Liu, Shengyu Chen, Xinshuai Dong, Yanchi Liu, Xujiang Zhao, Haoyu Wang, Yujun Yan, Haifeng Chen, Zhengzhang Chen
arXiv:2607. 26455v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in knowledge acquisition and reasoning, yet their ability to retain previously acquired knowledge under repeated updates remains insufficiently understood.
By Ruxi Gu, Zhenliang Zhang, Wei Wang
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in knowledge acquisition and reasoning, yet their ability to retain previously acquired knowledge under repeated updates remains insufficiently understood. Existing evaluation paradigms primarily focus on single-step reasoning or static knowledge editing, which fail to capture the temporal dynamics of knowledge retention and degradation during continual model modification.
arXiv:2605. 20247v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Catastrophic forgetting remains a major obstacle to continual learning in large language models (LLMs) and vision--language models (VLMs).
By Yang Liu, Toan Nguyen, Flora D. Salim
The paper introduces Spaced Repetition Training (SRT), a continual learning framework that schedules sample rehearsal using the SM-2 algorithm. SRT tracks per-example review states and maps perplexity to recall quality, allowing the training loop to decide which examples to replay and when. Experiments on Wikipedia and code corpora show that SRT improves the stability‑plasticity trade‑off, recovers 5–37 percentage points of lost old‑knowledge accuracy, and preserves benchmark performance better than naive continual pre‑training or uniform replay.
By Alankar Atreya, Devesh Batra, Yoages Kumar Mantri, Geremy Bantug, Greig A Cowan, Raad Khraishi
The paper introduces EoupCT, a framework that estimates and orthogonalizes unknown pre‑training gradients to mitigate catastrophic forgetting during continual fine‑tuning of large language models. It generates pseudo data most susceptible to forgetting using a learnable soft prompt with Gumbel‑Softmax, then jointly optimizes model parameters and the prompt via a first‑order Pareto optimizer to enforce orthogonality between new task updates and the estimated gradients. Experiments on multiple LLMs show that EoupCT preserves both task‑specific performance and the models’ inherent general‑purpose knowledge.
By Bing Wang, Changchun Li, Xin-Qiang Cai, Lin Yuanbo Wu, Ximing Li, Gang Niu, Masashi Sugiyama
The paper introduces Spaced Repetition Training (SRT), a continual learning framework that adapts review scheduling for language models by using the SM-2 algorithm to decide which past examples to replay. SRT tracks per-example review states and maps perplexity to a recall-quality signal, allowing the model to retain old knowledge while consolidating new information without changing the underlying model or training objective. Experiments on Wikipedia and code corpora show that SRT improves the stability-plasticity trade‑off, recovers 5–37 percentage points of lost accuracy, and maintains benchmark performance better than naive continual pre‑training or uniform replay; similar benefits are observed in vision and tabular data when an appropriate recall signal is used.
arXiv:2605. 05285v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) often suffer from catastrophic forgetting in continual learning: after learning new tasks sequentially, they perform worse on earlier tasks.
By Yazheng Liu, Yuxuan Wan, Rui Xu, Xi Zhang, Sihong Xie, Hui Xiong
arXiv:2609.37889v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Multimodal continual instruction tuning (MCIT) aims to enable multimodal large language models to acquire new capabilities from sequential tasks whil...
By Tao Hu, Zhinuo Zhou, Xialiang Tong, De-Chuan Zhan, Da-Wei Zhou
arXiv:2609.06986v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Language models may need to internalize information that arrives over time and retain it through many subsequent updates. To study this challenge, we i...
By Zheyuan Zhang, Alvin Zhang, Daniel Khashabi, Tianmin Shu