The paper investigates whether reasoning representations—explanations for large language model outputs—aid humans in evaluating those outputs. A controlled human study tested six reasoning formats across tasks of varying complexity, measuring structural understanding, error detection, and trust calibration. Results revealed a mismatch: participants favored planning- and decomposition-based representations, yet simpler chain-of-thought traces better supported verification, trust, and interpretability, while preferred formats increased calibration risks.
By Jaewoo Lim, Sungbok Shin, Sanghyun Hong
The paper introduces a new benchmark that evaluates large language models (LLMs) on their agentic mathematical reasoning rather than just final answers. It aligns problem‑solving behaviors with a taxonomy of reusable mathematical atomic capabilities and includes planning, action, and feedback tasks in both textual and multimodal settings. Experiments show that models with similar end‑to‑end accuracy can have very different agentic profiles, highlighting the importance of process‑level evaluation.
By Jiayi Kuang, Yinghui Li, Yunze Song, Keyu Chen, Zhifeng Shen, Yangning Li, Yidong Wang, Di Yin, Ruizhi Qiao, Xing Sun, Kai Jin, Ying Shen, Liang Lin, Philip S. Yu
arXiv:2604.14121v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly used for various tasks, often coupled with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting to boost accuracy...
By Zipeng Ling, Shuliang Liu, Seonil Son, Shenghong Fu, Yuehao Tang, Yao Wan, Xuming Hu
ReFIne is a training framework that augments large reasoning models with three trustworthiness properties: interpretability, faithfulness, and reliability. It combines supervised fine‑tuning with GRPO to produce structured, tag‑based reasoning traces, explicitly disclose decisive information, and provide self‑assessments of soundness and confidence. Applied to Qwen3 models, ReFIne improves interpretability by 44.0 %, faithfulness by 18.8 %, and reliability by 42.4 % on mathematical benchmarks.
By Chung-En Sun, Ge Yan, Akshay Kulkarni, Tsui-Wei Weng
arXiv:2602. 13904v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning is fundamental to modern LLM architectures and represents a critical intervention point for AI safety.
By Manqing Liu, David Williams-King, Ida Caspary, Linh Le, Hannes Whittingham, Puria Radmard, Cameron Tice, Edward James Young
arXiv:2608.23205v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have revolutionized reasoning in LLMs, and the increasing public availability of reasoning traces creates valuable opport...
By Maria-Eleni Zoumpoulidi, Georgios Paraskevopoulos, Alexandros Potamianos
arXiv:2606. 27757v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have attracted widespread attention from academia and industry, yet their deployment raises critical security concerns regarding robustness and reliability.
By Jiajing Zhang, Jiamei Jiang, Chenyang Zhang, Feifei Mo, Linjing Li, Daniel Zeng
arXiv:2605. 19723v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Mathematical reasoning is essential for problem-solving in education, science, and industry, serving as a crucial benchmark for evaluating artificial intelligence systems.
By Husnain Amjad, Raja Khurram Shahzad, Aamir Shahzad, Mehwish Fatima
arXiv:2606. 16603v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-based agents have demonstrated strong capabilities in data-intensive analytical tasks, yet their outputs are rarely verifiable: a reliance on linear text trajectories makes their reasoning difficult to audit.
By Jiajie Jin, Zhao Yang, Wenle Liao, Yuyang Hu, Guanting Dong, Xiaoxi Li, Yutao Zhu, Zhicheng Dou
The paper investigates when intermediate reasoning traces benefit machine translation by examining models, languages, domains, and datasets. It finds that the optimal reasoning language depends on the model, reasoning length has a non‑monotonic effect on quality, and traces display recurring functional patterns. Using Hierarchical Meta‑Summarization, the authors uncover a shared structure of understanding/planning, translating/drafting, and refining/verifying, while also noting domain‑specific variations, suggesting that reasoning should be tailored rather than uniformly applied.
By Yuxiang Liu, Jiaming Luo, Eleftheria Briakou, Colin Cherry
arXiv:2604.13706v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Professional fact-checkers rely on domain knowledge and deep contextual understanding to verify claims. Large language models (LLMs) and large reas...
By Dhruv Sahnan, Subhabrata Dutta, Tanmoy Chakraborty, Preslav Nakov, Iryna Gurevych
arXiv:2608. 13476v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present Multi-Agent Reasoning and Coordination (MARC), an open-source framework that replaces monolithic LLM prompting with deterministic multi-agent orchestration for clinical reasoning.
By Saisha Shetty, Satvik Tripathi, Austin Lin, Colin Zhao, Theodore Kim, Don Enwerem, Jacinta Arnold, Shahriar Faghani, Tessa S Cook