arXiv:2606. 27757v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have attracted widespread attention from academia and industry, yet their deployment raises critical security concerns regarding robustness and reliability.
arXiv:2606. 29700v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Planning often requires symbolic specifications that are both executable and verifiable.
arXiv:2608. 16637v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLMs remain unreliable for long-horizon planning, often generating logically inconsistent or non-applicable plans.
arXiv:2609.37554v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as high-level planners in robot navigation, but their outputs may become unreliable when instructi...
arXiv:2607. 01595v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As the scale and complexity of cloud-based AI systems continue to escalate, ensuring service reliability through rapid fault detection and adaptive recovery has become a critical challenge.
arXiv:2606. 14574v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as planners for autonomous agents in household environments.
arXiv:2606. 03685v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) improves end-to-end classical planning in large language models (LLMs), but do these models also learn to represent and reason about the planning problems they are solving?
arXiv:2604. 27960v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recent large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive reasoning milestones but continue to struggle with high computational costs, logical inconsistencies, and sharp performance degradation on high-complexity problems.
arXiv:2608.21897v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reliable planning requires converting natural-language instructions into executable symbolic specifications, yet large language models remain brittle w...
arXiv:2603. 02070v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: When automating plan generation for a real-world sequential decision problem, the goal is often not to replace the human planner, but to facilitate an iterative reasoning and elicitation process, where the human's role is to guide the AI planner according to their preferences and expertise.
arXiv:2606. 18519v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Though robotic systems are now being commercialized and deployed in various industries, many of these systems are highly specialized and often require an advanced skill set to operate and ensure they perform as instructed.
The paper evaluates how well current Large Language Models can translate natural language goals, written by video game testers, into well‑formed PDDL targets for classical planning. Using a carefully designed prompt template, six state‑of‑the‑art LLMs were tested on correctness, speed, and error tendencies with real‑world benchmarks. All models achieved high correctness (>92%), with Gemini 2.5 Flash reaching 96% accuracy and the fewest false positives, while GPT‑4.1 was the fastest, yet differences in performance and occasional failures due to ambiguity and domain limits remain.
arXiv:2510. 00182v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: While we know that large language models (LLMs) can solve some planning problems, we do not understand the extent of these capabilities for robotics.