arXiv:2608.21023v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Word alignment has traditionally been studied between sentences, but many cross-lingual tasks increasingly require correspondences across full document...
By Michelle Wastl, Jannis Vamvas, Rico Sennrich
As state-of-the-art machine translation models saturate standard benchmarks, the field needs more challenging evaluations to distinguish between models of varying quality. We propose augmenting existi...
arXiv:2608. 15932v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As state-of-the-art machine translation models saturate standard benchmarks, the field needs more challenging evaluations to distinguish between models of varying quality.
By William Kalikman, \v{S}imon Sukup, Michal Te\v{s}nar, Vil\'em Zouhar
arXiv:2509. 26169v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Alignment of large language models remains a central challenge in natural language processing.
By Fr\'ed\'eric Berdoz, Luca A. Lanzend\"orfer, Ren\'e Caky, Roger Wattenhofer
arXiv:2609.23551v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Standard positional encodings represent position as a one-dimensional reading-order coordinate, but reading order alone does not determine hierarchical...
By Shuyang Xiang
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly expected to follow long lists of constraints in complex instructions, and synthesizing instructions from a reference document (i. e.
The paper introduces Iterative MBR Distillation for Error Span Detection (ESD) in machine translation, a self‑evolution framework that replaces human annotations with pseudo‑labels generated by a large language model. By iteratively applying Minimum Bayes Risk decoding, the method produces high‑quality error spans without costly human effort. Experiments on WMT Metrics Shared Task datasets show that models trained solely on these pseudo‑labels outperform both unadapted baselines and supervised models trained on human data at system and span levels, while keeping sentence‑level performance competitive.
By Boxuan Lyu, Haiyue Song, Zhi Qu
The paper introduces a semiotics-aware framework for assessing natural language generation, focusing on how well two texts align in terms of contextual meaning and discourse references. It defines two metrics—Semiotic Fidelity and Semiotic Coverage—to quantify how much of one text’s semiotic profile is supported by the other and how much of the other’s profile is recovered. Experiments reveal that coverage is usually lower than fidelity, and that language models align best with human-curated data at low sampling temperatures, with higher temperatures diminishing this alignment.
By Lorenzo Zangari, Davide Picca
Doc2FRC introduces Fixed-Range Chunking (FRC), a dynamic programming method that partitions documents into chunks of a predefined length interval, ensuring consistent length distributions during training and inference. This approach reduces train-test length mismatch, mitigates n-gram repetition, and improves translation quality for 7B LLMs compared to direct Doc2Doc fine-tuning. Experiments on IWSLT2017 and a new 10-language test set, GlobVDoc, demonstrate that FRC outperforms existing document-level machine translation methods and enhances out-of-distribution translation performance.
By Xiaotian Wang, Youyuan Lin, Zhan Shen, Hitomi Yanaka
Sentence-level AI-generated text detection (S-AGTD) for hybrid documents, where humans and LLMs co-author one text, faces two gaps: existing methods classify each sentence in isolation, discarding inter-sentence dependencies, and existing benchmarks omit the newest generation of generators. We construct MOSAIC, a benchmark of 16,000 hybrid documents over PubMed and XSum, generated by DeepSeek-V3.
arXiv:2607. 07669v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models increasingly \emph{understand} dialectal English, yet still \emph{produce} only standard, US-leaning English, leaving dialectal generation, the harder half of the problem, largely unaddressed.
By Jordan Painter, Dipankar Srirag, Adarsh Kappiyath, Diptesh Kanojia, Aditya Joshi, Lu Yin
arXiv:2607. 17524v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We propose Token-Level Off-Policy Labeling (TOPL), an off-policy training paradigm that reframes post-training as a token-level correctness prediction task.
By Zitong Huang, Gustavo Lucas Carvalho, Deqing Fu, Robin Jia