arXiv:2606.09788v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large-scale document processing requires contextually aware table extraction (TE) that is both accurate and efficient. Yet current approaches requi...
arXiv:2610.33066v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce OvisOCR3, a 0.8B model for a broad range of OCR-related tasks. OvisOCR3 unifies document parsing, general OCR, key information extraction...
arXiv:2608. 01400v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tabular foundation models, driven by in-context learning, have rapidly grown in quality and popularity.
Table understanding is a core task in document intelligence, encompassing two key subtasks: table reconstruction and table visual question answering (TabVQA). While recent approaches predominantly rel...
arXiv:2609.08330v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Table detection is a core task in document analysis, supporting downstream applications such as information retrieval, document reconstruction, and vis...
arXiv:2609.17458v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Table understanding is a core task in document intelligence, encompassing two key subtasks: table reconstruction and table visual question answering...
arXiv:2607. 29677v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Enterprise workflows increasingly rely on agents for \emph{schema-guided extraction}: given a document and a user-defined schema, the agent faithfully follows the schema to produce the correct output with source evidence as grounding metadata.
DR Pixel introduces a page‑native deep research agent that uses rendered document page images as the sole unit for retrieval and reasoning, bypassing OCR. The open‑source system operates on 1.06 M pages and, without training, outperforms OCR‑based baselines on GPT‑5.4, Gemini‑3.5‑Flash, and Qwen3.6‑27B while requiring fewer tool calls. Training with counterfactual credit reweighting further boosts retrieval recall by ~15 points and accuracy by >10 points on the DRPixelBench benchmark, and brings the model within 1.8 points of an oracle on the ViDoRe‑V3 out‑of‑distribution test.
ShredBench is a new benchmark for evaluating multimodal large language models (MLLMs) on the task of reconstructing documents from shredded fragments. It uses an automated pipeline that generates fragmented documents from Markdown, covering English, Chinese, code, and table scenarios with varying fragmentation levels. Experiments show that while MLLMs perform well on intact documents, their performance drops sharply when documents are shredded, revealing a gap in fine‑grained cross‑modal reasoning.
The paper introduces the Structural Semantic Unit (SSU) and the Coverage, Overlap, Trespass, and Excess (COTe) score as a new framework for evaluating Document Layout Analysis (DLA) models. Unlike traditional metrics such as IoU, F1, or mAP, which are tailored to 2D projections of 3D space, COTe focuses on the semantic structure of printed media and is decomposable to reveal specific failure modes like breaching semantic boundaries or redundant parsing. Experiments on five common DLA models across three datasets show that COTe is more informative and robust—especially under granularity mismatches—than F1, and the authors provide an SSU-labelled dataset and a Python library to facilitate adoption.
The paper investigates the gap between retrieval and reading in document vision‑language models, showing that even when the correct page is retrieved, the model often fails to use the text on that page. By comparing answers derived from page images alone versus images plus extracted OCR text, the authors demonstrate that adding OCR text can improve strict accuracy by 13 to 16 points on their FoveDoc‑Bench benchmark. The study also reveals that OCR benefits textual evidence but not charts or figures, and that its advantage diminishes as retrieval quality worsens.
arXiv:2606. 09578v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly evaluated on table reasoning tasks, but the role of table representation remains under-explored.