arXiv:2608.29010v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: People share mental health diagnoses on social media, yet how such language becomes visible around their self-disclosure, and whether community engag...
By Renkai Ma, Lingyao Li, Shanting Chen, Chen Chen, Fan Yang, Yuanyuan Lei
The study analyzes how mental health self‑disclosure on Twitter changed after Elon Musk’s 2022 acquisition, examining 824K tweets related to anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, and suicidal ideation. Using LIWC and an LLM‑based intimacy classifier, researchers found a post‑acquisition decline in affective and social language, a rise in first‑person singular pronouns and future‑focused expressions, and varied intimacy patterns across conditions—low‑intimacy disclosures increased for anxiety, depression, and BPD, while high‑intimacy disclosures rose for suicide‑related posts. Only the moderate‑versus‑low intimacy decline for BPD remained statistically significant compared to broader Twitter discourse.
By Olivia Pal, Yunhao Yuan, Meghana Mandava, Talayeh Aledavood, Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Koustuv Saha
arXiv:2610.35512v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Mental health research on social media has been dominated by English-language datasets and DSM-5-centered resources, limiting cross-lingual and cross-c...
By Bingrui Jin, Baihan Li, Zitong Li, Kunyao Lan, Shimeng Li, Kenny Q. Zhu, Mengyue Wu
arXiv:2609.35953v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Young people increasingly turn to General-Purpose Conversational Agents (GPCAs), such as ChatGPT, in moments of distress. We examine young adults' (age...
By Marx Wang, Ella Zhang, Cameron Tan, Andrea Mock, Songling Ngo, Zijing Wang, Robert Wolfe, Shirin Amouei, Rachel A. Hanebutt, Desmond C. Ong, Caroline Figueroa, Katie Davis, Anind K. Dey, Alexis Hiniker
The paper introduces the COmmunity-centered Peer Engaged Support (COPES) dataset and a three‑axis evaluation framework to gauge how well Large Language Models (LLMs) align with community perspectives on mental‑health support queries. Experiments show that fine‑tuning LLMs on COPES improves strategy alignment and emotion‑tone alignment by over 50% for general‑purpose models, yet these gains are uneven across subreddits and coping strategies. The study also finds that post‑training shifts the model’s recommendations toward problem‑focused advice while reducing emotion‑focused responses, indicating persistent disparities in performance across different communities and needs.
By Mohit Chandra, Nabin Kim, Eli Min, Aamogh Sawant, Tanmay Sutar, Munmun De Choudhury
arXiv:2409.02244v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being used as ad hoc therapists. While prior research has found that LLMs outperform human coun...
By Zainab Iftikhar, Sean Ransom, Amy Xiao, Nicole Nugent, Jeff Huang
The study examines how large language models (LLMs) predict depression scores from language responses. In a "Mirror" setup, participants answered structured diagnostic interviews that the LLMs used to predict scores, yielding near-perfect predictions. In a "Non-Mirror" setup, participants gave life history interviews; the LLMs still achieved outstanding prediction accuracy, and both conditions correlated similarly with PHQ-9 scores, indicating that the Mirror advantage disappears when predicting an independent measure. Topic modeling showed different depression themes across interview types, suggesting Mirror evaluations are more about reliability than validity and that Non-Mirror approaches may enhance clinical relevance.
By Tong Li, Rasiq Hussain, Mehak Gupta, Joshua R. Oltmanns
The study examines how exposure to distress disclosures in online graduate admissions communities affects users’ psychosocial wellbeing. Analyzing over 1.1 million comments across two Reddit communities, the authors find that users who engage with peer distress during application preparation show higher levels of anxiety, depression, and stress expression, as well as increased commenting activity and lexical redundancy. These effects persist across admissions cycles, but downstream respondents who interact with previously exposed users do not show similar psychosocial changes.
By Veda Duddu, Agam Goyal, Sabelle Huang, Ayush Umashankar Prasad, Mingquan Yi, Koustuv Saha
arXiv:2606. 27247v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In NLP, mental health conditions are often modeled as isolated phenomena, without interpersonal context.
By Parmitha Vangapandu, Sai Ganesh Mokkapati, Sathwik Narkedimilli, MSVPJ Sathvik, Timothy Liu, Simon See, Johannes C. Eichstaedt
arXiv:2511.07011v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Background: Remotely captured spoken language could provide objective, regular indicators of depression symptom severity. However, research t...
By Anastasiia Tokareva, Judith Dineley, Zoe Firth, Pauline Conde, Faith Matcham, Sara Siddi, Femke Lamers, Ewan Carr, Carolin Oetzmann, Daniel Leightley, Yuezhou Zhang, Amos A. Folarin, Josep Maria Haro, Brenda W. J. H. Penninx, Raquel Bailon, Srinivasan Vairavan, Til Wykes, Richard J. B. Dobson, Vaibhav A. Narayan, Matthew Hotopf, Nicholas Cummins, The RADAR-CNS Consortium
OpenAI collaborated with 170+ mental health experts to improve ChatGPT’s ability to recognize distress, respond empathetically, and guide users toward real-world support—reducing unsafe responses by up to 80%. Learn how we’re making ChatGPT safer and more supportive in sensitive moments.
LongCounsel-8 is a new benchmark suite comprising three datasets with 7,749 five‑session counseling dialogues, each grounded in real client profiles, depression trajectories, symptom compositions, and counseling patterns. The benchmark addresses challenges of longitudinal consistency, empirical grounding of symptom progression, and natural expression of controlled depression states without exposing labels. Experiments show that lower single‑session error does not ensure accurate trend detection, methods perform worse on worsening trajectories, and adding more session history can reduce trend prediction accuracy.
By Jiayi Li, Zhaomin Wu, Bingsheng He