SAGE is a governed multi‑stage LLM pipeline that transforms enterprise guideline documents—containing narrative text, tables, and images—into structured artifacts. It uses a shared versioned rule store, schema‑validated contracts, and provenance tracking to validate, score, and reconcile extracted rules, automatically approving high‑confidence outputs while flagging uncertain items for human review. In a test on 120 documents, SAGE reduced processing time from days to 20–100 minutes and achieved a 96% success rate with only 3.2% hallucination.
arXiv:2608. 12133v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Enterprise guideline documents are heterogeneous and multimodal, combining narrative text, complex tables, and embedded images.
arXiv:2608. 16763v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Financial document validation in production, such as payroll auditing, tax compliance, and loan underwriting, demands exceptional accuracy, consistency, and reproducibility under strict enterprise constraints.
arXiv:2608. 11022v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Model Cards and Data Cards have demonstrated the value of structured, human-readable documentation for machine learning artifacts, capturing their context, parameters, limitations, and intended use.
arXiv:2607. 29677v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Enterprise workflows increasingly rely on agents for \emph{schema-guided extraction}: given a document and a user-defined schema, the agent faithfully follows the schema to produce the correct output with source evidence as grounding metadata.
The paper evaluates eleven vision‑language models (VLMs) for extracting structured fields from business documents, focusing on robustness, cost, and governance rather than just accuracy. Using a held‑out set of 750 synthetic checks, the study finds that fine‑tuning open‑source VLMs on 3,000 samples yields an F1 score above 0.98, surpassing all zero‑shot commercial systems, while GPT‑5 tops the commercial group and Claude Sonnet 4.5 fails on date extraction. The authors also present a practitioner‑oriented selection framework that maps task profiles—such as quality, latency, governance, and volume—to recommended approaches via filtering and total‑cost minimization, demonstrated on a mid‑volume document‑extraction scenario.
arXiv:2606. 09852v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: High-quality source code documentation is vital yet often neglected, especially in critical domains like healthcare where reliability and maintainability are essential.
Large language models (LLMs) increasingly support complex professional tasks, yet their capabilities in rule-intensive document review remain insufficiently evaluated. National standard documents, such as China GB/T standards, offer a representative testbed: they are lengthy, highly structured, and governed by explicit rules for scope, terminology, normative wording, and cross-section consistency.
arXiv:2609.01575v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Extracting structured fields from hundreds of millions of documents annually remains costly in regulated industries: bespoke OCR cascades cover only a...
Transforming table-form documents into machine-processable records requires recovering not only their visible content but also the multilevel structure that organizes it. However, existing benchmarks evaluate either holistic document outputs or conventional table grids, and their aggregate scores provide little insight into where structural failures occur.
arXiv:2607. 19865v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As autonomous agents rapidly evolve, their ability to reliably manipulate ubiquitous digital documents has become critical for enabling general-purpose AI assistants and automating complex workspace workflows.
arXiv:2608.29575v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models are increasingly used to read documents and produce downstream text, creating a provenance problem when the document owner cannot...
The paper introduces PRISMA-LLM, a reporting framework for AI-assisted systematic reviews. It is based on an analysis of 888 review-automation papers, showing a shift toward LLM- and software-driven workflows and inconsistent reporting of evaluation and limitations. The framework separates implementation details from consequence-sensitive evaluation and limitation reporting.