arXiv:2601. 22025v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Evaluating Large Language Model (LLM) applications differs from conventional software testing because outputs are probabilistic, semantically variable, and sensitive to prompt and model changes.
By Daniel Commey
arXiv:2608. 10037v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on external tools to accomplish complex real-world tasks, making tool documentation a critical grounding resource for LLM agents.
By You Lu, Kun Zhang, Bihuan Chen, Xin Peng
arXiv:2604. 05435v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Incomplete or inconsistent discharge documentation drives care fragmentation and avoidable readmissions.
By Akshat Dasula, Prasanna Desikan, Jaideep Srivastava, Shivali Dalmia, Abhishek Mukherji
arXiv:2511. 14967v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown great promise in generating structured diagrams from natural language descriptions, particularly Mermaid sequence diagrams for software engineering.
By Basel Shbita, Farhan Ahmed, Chad DeLuca
arXiv:2607. 13035v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Cloud services experience frequent incidents that require rapid diagnosis and resolution.
By Srihari Unnikrishnan, Jaskaran Singh Walia, Drishti Goel, Supriyo Ghosh
Large language models (LLMs) increasingly support complex professional tasks, yet their capabilities in rule-intensive document review remain insufficiently evaluated. National standard documents, such as China GB/T standards, offer a representative testbed: they are lengthy, highly structured, and governed by explicit rules for scope, terminology, normative wording, and cross-section consistency.