LongDocBench: Benchmarking TOC Hierarchy and Contextual Relationship Recovery in Long Documents
arXiv:2608. 15064v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Parsing visual documents into machine-readable representations is fundamental to document intelligence.
Transforming table-form documents into machine-processable records requires recovering not only their visible content but also the multilevel structure that organizes it. However, existing benchmarks evaluate either holistic document outputs or conventional table grids, and their aggregate scores provide little insight into where structural failures occur.
arXiv:2608. 15064v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Parsing visual documents into machine-readable representations is fundamental to document intelligence.
arXiv:2607. 29677v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Enterprise workflows increasingly rely on agents for \emph{schema-guided extraction}: given a document and a user-defined schema, the agent faithfully follows the schema to produce the correct output with source evidence as grounding metadata.
arXiv:2605.19309v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Document Layout Analysis (DLA) pipelines provide structured page representations for retrieval-augmented generation, long-document question answeri...
Practical AI systems increasingly need to turn long, heterogeneous documents into queryable relational databases, not isolated spreadsheets. In domains such as finance, healthcare, education, transportation, and enterprise operations, downstream workflows rely on normalized schemas, entity identities, keys, cross-table relationships, and integrity constraints for analytics, compliance, auditing, and SQL-backed decision making.
arXiv:2608. 08459v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Practical AI systems increasingly need to turn long, heterogeneous documents into queryable relational databases, not isolated spreadsheets.
WeVisDoc is a two‑stage data‑centric framework designed to improve end‑to‑end document parsing. Stage I expands coverage by adding heterogeneous data and applying structure‑preserving degradation synthesis, while Stage II evaluates residual errors with a held‑out probe and uses those diagnostics to target data construction and token budget reallocation. The resulting WeVisDoc‑4B model achieves an overall score of 95.38 on OmniDocBench v1.6 and outperforms competing parsers across all evaluated settings, with Stage II delivering notable gains on degraded tracks.
arXiv:2606. 09578v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly evaluated on table reasoning tasks, but the role of table representation remains under-explored.
arXiv:2603. 18652v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reliably extracting tables from PDFs is essential for large-scale scientific data mining and knowledge base construction, yet existing evaluation approaches rely on rule-based metrics that fail to capture semantic equivalence of table content.
arXiv:2608. 16763v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Financial document validation in production, such as payroll auditing, tax compliance, and loan underwriting, demands exceptional accuracy, consistency, and reproducibility under strict enterprise constraints.
SAGE is a governed multi‑stage LLM pipeline that transforms enterprise guideline documents—containing narrative text, tables, and images—into structured artifacts. It uses a shared versioned rule store, schema‑validated contracts, and provenance tracking to validate, score, and reconcile extracted rules, automatically approving high‑confidence outputs while flagging uncertain items for human review. In a test on 120 documents, SAGE reduced processing time from days to 20–100 minutes and achieved a 96% success rate with only 3.2% hallucination.
Institutional documents contain substantial amounts of operational and analytical information embedded within figures and tables. Current approaches for extracting visual content from documents are largely built around generic document layout analysis, where figures and tables are treated as uniformly relevant document objects rather than semantically meaningful analytical artifacts.
arXiv:2606. 06242v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Institutional documents contain substantial amounts of operational and analytical information embedded within figures and tables.