arXiv:2606. 00049v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are widely recognised for their applications in natural language generation and are increasingly used for code generation tasks.
arXiv:2608. 11513v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into software engineering workflows, helping developers write, debug, test, and maintain code.
arXiv:2508. 16131v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Code completion entails the task of providing missing tokens given a surrounding context.
arXiv:2606. 30587v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Researchers and practitioners increasingly apply Large Language Models (LLMs) for automated vulnerability detection.
arXiv:2605.01392v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential across software engineering tasks, including soft...
arXiv:2607. 01867v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The use of LLMs in software development has become increasingly widespread on tasks such as code generation and summarization.
The use of LLMs in software development has become increasingly widespread on tasks such as code generation and summarization. Reports from large technology companies showed that around 20% to 30% of their code are generated by LLMs.
arXiv:2608. 10319v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-powered agents have rapidly evolved from code-completion tools into solvers of complex software engineering tasks.
arXiv:2608.27831v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Coding agents are now commonly evaluated on the SWE-bench family of benchmarks, whose tasks are built from curated GitHub issues--long, structured, a...
ContextEcho is a benchmark and harness designed to measure persona drift in large language models during long, tool‑using coding sessions. It includes a 25‑probe identity suite, a snapshot‑then‑probe protocol that preserves the main conversation, and both judged and judge‑free measurement surfaces. Across 23 frontier models and thousands of turns, the benchmark shows that persona drift is widespread, not limited to specific model families, and that simple in‑session compaction does not reset it, while a single‑shot anchor can restore the intended persona.
arXiv:2606. 31159v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly transforming software development, yet their use in security-critical contexts raises a key question: do models know when their generated code is insecure?
The paper presents a taxonomy-driven framework for identifying, categorizing, and explaining bias in AI-generated Python code. By extending an existing dataset and manually annotating bias categories and justifications, the authors evaluate both proprietary and open-source large language models (LLMs) for automated bias detection and explanation. Results show that models such as Gemini and Qwen3-coder achieve high classification accuracy and produce justification and code identification similarities that closely match human-authored reasoning.