arXiv:2608. 11513v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into software engineering workflows, helping developers write, debug, test, and maintain code.
arXiv:2609.22102v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely used as programming assistants, yet it remains unclear whether and how user's demographic information impacts...
arXiv:2602.21223v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: It is not only what we ask large language models (LLMs) to do that matters, but also how we ask them. Phrases like ``This is urgent'' or ``As your...
arXiv:2606. 30587v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Researchers and practitioners increasingly apply Large Language Models (LLMs) for automated vulnerability detection.
arXiv:2603.18740v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Automated Code Review (ACR) systems integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in software development workflows, rang...
The study investigates how users interact with ChatGPT for code generation beyond simple function-level tasks, focusing on project-level benchmarks that involve multi-class dependencies. A user study with 36 participants examined prompting patterns, screen recordings, and chat logs to identify Human‑LLM Interaction (HLI) features that influence productivity. The results highlight three consistently supportive HLI features, five guidelines to boost productivity, and a taxonomy of 29 runtime and logic errors with mitigation strategies.
The paper investigates how small lexical changes in prompts can cause large performance swings in large language models. Using a dataset of 132,000 prompt variants, the authors uncover a scaling law linking higher average task performance to lower variance and greater robustness. They identify domain-specific terminology and explicit action directives as key linguistic factors that stabilize prompts, and propose an automated Prompt-Refining Agent that reduces performance variance by 40.7% in code generation while maintaining or improving mean performance.
arXiv:2607. 03968v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models are increasingly deployed as IDE-integrated coding agents that decompose tasks, generate and edit files, run code, and refine outputs over many turns.
The paper presents a taxonomy-driven framework for identifying, categorizing, and explaining bias in AI-generated Python code. By extending an existing dataset and manually annotating bias categories and justifications, the authors evaluate both proprietary and open-source large language models (LLMs) for automated bias detection and explanation. Results show that models such as Gemini and Qwen3-coder achieve high classification accuracy and produce justification and code identification similarities that closely match human-authored reasoning.
arXiv:2508. 16131v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Code completion entails the task of providing missing tokens given a surrounding context.
arXiv:2606. 00049v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are widely recognised for their applications in natural language generation and are increasingly used for code generation tasks.
arXiv:2605.01392v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential across software engineering tasks, including soft...
arXiv:2608.30756v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have become an essential tool for assisting developers, yet we still lack knowledge on ways to effectively support their...