arXiv Computation and Language

Aligning Large Language Models with Human Feedback: Mathematical Foundations and Algorithm Design

arXiv AI
5d ago

Doubly Robust Alignment for Large Language Models

The paper introduces a doubly robust preference optimization algorithm for reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) in large language models. It addresses sensitivity to misspecifications in the preference model, reference policy, or reward function by ensuring consistency when either the preference model or the reference policy is correctly specified. Experiments show that the method outperforms state‑of‑the‑art algorithms both theoretically and empirically.

By Erhan Xu, Kai Ye, Hongyi Zhou, Luhan Zhu, Francesco Quinzan, Chengchun Shi
arXiv AI
Jun 10

A Comprehensive Survey of Direct Preference Optimization: Datasets, Theories, Variants, and Applications

arXiv:2410. 15595v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), aligning policy models with human preferences has become increasingly critical.

By Wenyi Xiao, Zechuan Wang, Leilei Gan, Shuai Zhao, Zongrui Li, Ruirui Lei, Wanggui He, Luu Anh Tuan, Long Chen, Hao Jiang, Zhou Zhao, Fei Wu
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 22

Inverse RL Helps Align AI by Imitating Humans

The paper introduces PARED, an approach that uses inverse reinforcement learning to derive an explicit, interpretable reward from expert demonstrations. By training a lightweight discriminator on response-level features, PARED can guide both inference-time reranking and on-policy reinforcement learning, improving alignment for models that have not undergone supervised fine-tuning and further refining those that have. The method also supports contextual alignment, enabling a single policy to adapt its responses to different audience preferences.

By Micha{\l} Wili\'nski, Liu Leqi, Chirag Nagpal
arXiv AI
Oct 19

Two Minds Better Than One: Collaborative Reward Modeling for LLM Alignment

The paper introduces Collaborative Reward Modeling (CRM), an online framework that uses cross-model peer review and curriculum learning to identify reliable preference pairs for training reward models (RMs). By having two RMs evaluate each other's sample selections and synchronizing their learning progress, CRM reduces the impact of noisy feedback, improving RM generalization by up to 9.94 points on RewardBench under 40% preference noise. The approach also extends to implicit-reward alignment, demonstrating robustness and broad applicability for learning from imperfect feedback.

By Jiazheng Zhang, Wenqing Jing, Zizhuo Zhang, Zhiheng Xi, Shihan Dou, Rongxiang Weng, Jiahuan Li, Jingang Wang, Mingxu Chai, Shibo Hong, Yuming Yang, Chenhao Huang, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang