arXiv:2606. 03093v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Prompting steers large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) without weight updates, but it remains unclear how instruction changes reshape internal representations to produce behavior.
By Fan L. Cheng, Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
arXiv:2608. 01968v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Transformer models are most often understood through what they do: their benchmark performance, generation quality, or behavior on downstream tasks.
By Kunal Kumar Pant, Nithin Nagaraj
arXiv:2608.30720v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Representational similarity is foundational to analyses of deep networks, yet distances between point-valued representations are not intrinsically tied...
By Kieran Murphy
The paper compares latent representations in Selective State Space Models (SSMs) like Mamba and Transformers such as Pythia using Sparse Autoencoders. Across a 10‑million token corpus, 99.98% of Mamba features align closely with Pythia’s, supporting the Universality Hypothesis that core semantic representations are similar across architectures. A tiny 0.02% of features diverge, with Mamba’s recurrent bottleneck causing it to compress syntactic anomalies into polysemantic neurons, whereas Pythia’s attention can isolate distinct formatting edge‑cases.
By Rithin Nagaraj, Rupa Laalasa Oruganti, Prerna Subhashchandra Kunder, Ashwini M Joshi
arXiv:2605. 28865v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: What does a world model learn from physical exploration, without any linguistic supervision?
By Jiayi Fang
arXiv:2607. 02386v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While Vision Transformers have achieved remarkable success across computer vision and language applications, the geometric evolution of their internal representations throughout training remains insufficiently understood.
By Kaustubh Kapil, Kishor P. Upla
arXiv:2609.05575v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Understanding how concepts are encoded in the internal representations of machine learning models is a central problem in mechanistic interpretability,...
By Yiming Tang, Harshvardhan Saini, Samyak Jha, Huaming Chen, Xufeng Duan, Dianbo Liu
arXiv:2607. 03671v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Models of complex systems often have many parameters, yet are constrained by far fewer experimentally accessible observables: similar activity can emerge from coordinated parameter changes.
By Ruilin Zhang, Louis Tao, Zhuo-Cheng Xiao
arXiv:2606. 24396v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Transformer models function as Dense Associative Memories (DAMs), retrieving knowledge via high-dimensional attractor dynamics driven by the self-attention mechanism \citep{ramsauer2020hopfield, wu2024attention}.
By Kanishk Awadhiya
arXiv:2607. 00089v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mechanistic interpretability has produced a rich inventory of component-level analyses that characterise what neural-network components encode and how they interact.
By Hussein Chouman, Wataru Sasaki, Tomokazu Matsui, Hirohiko Suwa, Keiichi Yasumoto
arXiv:2606. 09894v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Across contemplative, philosophical, and psychological accounts, human consciousness is often described along a similar spectrum, ranging from reactive and self-focused patterns to more integrative and coherent ones.
By Sophie Zhao
arXiv:2603. 06592v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Contemporary studies in mechanistic interpretability have uncovered many puzzling phenomena in the neural information processing of Transformer-based language models, such as induction heads, function vectors, and the Hydra effect.
By Jonas Rohweder, Subhabrata Dutta, Iryna Gurevych