arXiv Machine Learning

Velocity Scheduled Flow Matching

arXiv:2607. 11442v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Flow matching trains a neural network to regress the conditional velocity along a linear interpolant between noise and data, and the number of network evaluations~(NFE) sets the cost of sampling.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 13

Velocity Scheduled Flow Matching

Flow matching trains a neural network to regress the conditional velocity along a linear interpolant between noise and data, and the number of network evaluations~(NFE) sets the cost of sampling. The straight-line interpolant carries an implicit choice: the sample moves at constant speed throughout the trajectory.

arXiv Machine Learning
2d ago

Friction-Augmented Drifting Models for Resource-Efficient Domain Translation

arXiv:2604. 18194v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Single-step generators promise high-fidelity synthesis at a fraction of the inference and training cost of ordinary differential equation (ODE)-based flow models, a central concern when compute is limited.

By Arkadii Kazanskii, Tatiana Petrova, Andrey Ustyuzhanin, Konstantin Bagrianskii, Aleksandr Puzikov, Radu State
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 5

Trajectory inference via Acceleration Matching

arXiv:2608. 03916v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Trajectory inference is a fundamental problem in many scientific domains: given a collection of unpaired snapshots of observations at discrete time points, the goal is to generate smooth trajectories that best resemble and interpolate the data.

By Bartolo Dazzini, Giovanni Conforti, Alain Durmus, Aram-Alexandre Pooladian
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 5

Asymptotic-Preserving A Posteriori Analysis of Diffusion and Flow-Matching Samplers

Diffusion and flow-matching samplers integrate a learned probability-flow ODE from a large noise scale down to a small terminal floor $σ_{\min}$, at which the score is stiff and the flow develops a boundary layer. We treat $σ_{\min}$ as a singular-perturbation parameter and determine which fixed-step samplers are asymptotic-preserving (AP), that is, stable and uniformly accurate as $σ_{\min}\to0$, casting the criteria as an a posteriori audit: residual functionals with $σ_{\min}$-uniform coefficients, computable on a pretrained checkpoint without ground-truth scores or exact trajectories.