arXiv Computer Vision

Difficulty-Calibrated Interpolation Paths for Conditional Flow Matching

The paper introduces Difficulty-Calibrated Flow Matching, a method that adapts the noise-to-data interpolation schedule in Conditional Flow Matching based on a pilot run’s loss profile. By setting the schedule to the quantile function of this difficulty profile, the training trajectory spends more time where the velocity is hardest to learn. Experiments on CIFAR-10, MNIST, and Fashion‑MNIST show that this calibrated path achieves the best FID on CIFAR‑10 and outperforms all fixed schedules in large‑batch, few‑update settings, where compute is most limited.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 13

Velocity Scheduled Flow Matching

Flow matching trains a neural network to regress the conditional velocity along a linear interpolant between noise and data, and the number of network evaluations~(NFE) sets the cost of sampling. The straight-line interpolant carries an implicit choice: the sample moves at constant speed throughout the trajectory.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 14

Velocity Scheduled Flow Matching

arXiv:2607. 11442v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Flow matching trains a neural network to regress the conditional velocity along a linear interpolant between noise and data, and the number of network evaluations~(NFE) sets the cost of sampling.

By Vitalii Bondar
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 24

I-SplineFlow: Learning Monotone Spline Stochastic Interpolant Schedulers for Few-Step Generation

I‑SplineFlow introduces a new way to learn monotone spline stochastic interpolant schedulers for few‑step generation with pretrained diffusion and flow models. By parameterizing the scheduler with integrated monotone splines (I‑splines), the method decouples polynomial degree from the number of mixture weights, enabling compact support, better‑conditioned Jacobians, and strictly monotone signal‑to‑noise ratios without ordering constraints. Experiments on EDM, ReFlow, and Simple ReFlow show that I‑SplineFlow consistently improves few‑step FID over Bézier scheduling, especially at low NFEs, while training in only minutes.

By Md Sakib Hossain Shovon, Md Rifat Ur Rahman, Md Abtahi Majeed Chowdhury, Yunhong Min, Jaesik Choi, Minhyuk Sung
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 9

Few-Step Generation via Data-Space Iteration

The paper introduces data‑space iteration, a few‑step generation framework that eliminates the need for a fixed probability‑flow discretization. By refining predictions directly in data space with a shared generator, each iteration is trained to produce the best possible sample within its capacity. Experiments on class‑conditional ImageNet 256×256 show that data‑space iteration outperforms standard discretization baselines and matches or improves upon schedule‑searched variants without schedule‑specific training.

By Shanchuan Lin, Yansong Peng, Fu-Yun Wang, Haoqi Fan
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11

Model-Aware Schedules Improve Generation via Fiberwise Optimal Transport

The paper introduces model‑aware schedules for diffusion and flow‑matching generative models by leveraging fiberwise optimal transport. It defines a fiberwise prediction risk that averages optimal‑transport costs between true and predicted signal/noise decompositions, and combines this with kinetic action to derive a closed‑form optimal time allocation. Experiments on DDPMs and flow matching across various targets, datasets, and architectures show that these schedules consistently outperform strong baselines, achieving significant FID reductions and demonstrating empirical universality after normalizing risk profiles.

By Luyi Jia, Boyan Zhang, Yilun Liu, Steffen Rulands