Hugging Face Trending Papers

Velocity Scheduled Flow Matching

Flow matching trains a neural network to regress the conditional velocity along a linear interpolant between noise and data, and the number of network evaluations~(NFE) sets the cost of sampling. The straight-line interpolant carries an implicit choice: the sample moves at constant speed throughout the trajectory.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 14

Velocity Scheduled Flow Matching

arXiv:2607. 11442v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Flow matching trains a neural network to regress the conditional velocity along a linear interpolant between noise and data, and the number of network evaluations~(NFE) sets the cost of sampling.

By Vitalii Bondar
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 24

Difficulty-Calibrated Interpolation Paths for Conditional Flow Matching

The paper introduces Difficulty-Calibrated Flow Matching, a method that adapts the noise-to-data interpolation schedule in Conditional Flow Matching based on a pilot run’s loss profile. By setting the schedule to the quantile function of this difficulty profile, the training trajectory spends more time where the velocity is hardest to learn. Experiments on CIFAR-10, MNIST, and Fashion‑MNIST show that this calibrated path achieves the best FID on CIFAR‑10 and outperforms all fixed schedules in large‑batch, few‑update settings, where compute is most limited.

By Airin Akter Tania, Md Raihan Khan
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 24

I-SplineFlow: Learning Monotone Spline Stochastic Interpolant Schedulers for Few-Step Generation

I‑SplineFlow introduces a new way to learn monotone spline stochastic interpolant schedulers for few‑step generation with pretrained diffusion and flow models. By parameterizing the scheduler with integrated monotone splines (I‑splines), the method decouples polynomial degree from the number of mixture weights, enabling compact support, better‑conditioned Jacobians, and strictly monotone signal‑to‑noise ratios without ordering constraints. Experiments on EDM, ReFlow, and Simple ReFlow show that I‑SplineFlow consistently improves few‑step FID over Bézier scheduling, especially at low NFEs, while training in only minutes.

By Md Sakib Hossain Shovon, Md Rifat Ur Rahman, Md Abtahi Majeed Chowdhury, Yunhong Min, Jaesik Choi, Minhyuk Sung
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 17

Friction-Augmented Drifting Models for Resource-Efficient Domain Translation

arXiv:2604. 18194v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Single-step generators promise high-fidelity synthesis at a fraction of the inference and training cost of ordinary differential equation (ODE)-based flow models, a central concern when compute is limited.

By Arkadii Kazanskii, Tatiana Petrova, Andrey Ustyuzhanin, Konstantin Bagrianskii, Aleksandr Puzikov, Radu State
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 20

Continuous Adversarial MeanFlow Transfer

Training fast generators on new domains with limited data remains challenging for two reasons. First, adapting a pretrained diffusion or flow model to a new domain leaves its costly multi-step sampling unaddressed, and existing acceleration methods are tied to the source parameterization--$ε$, $x$, $v$, or $u$--leaving heterogeneous pretrained models with no common acceleration target.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 5

Trajectory inference via Acceleration Matching

arXiv:2608. 03916v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Trajectory inference is a fundamental problem in many scientific domains: given a collection of unpaired snapshots of observations at discrete time points, the goal is to generate smooth trajectories that best resemble and interpolate the data.

By Bartolo Dazzini, Giovanni Conforti, Alain Durmus, Aram-Alexandre Pooladian