arXiv Machine Learning

When Vision Meets Graphs: A Survey on Graph Reasoning and Learning

The survey titled "When Vision Meets Graphs: A Survey on Graph Reasoning and Learning" reviews how visual depictions of graphs can be used as inputs for graph reasoning and learning. It highlights that while Graph Neural Networks dominate graph machine learning, most pipelines ignore the visual form of graphs, despite scientists routinely interpreting graphs visually. The paper organizes existing work into three threads—vision for graph reasoning, vision for graph learning, and scientific graphs—aiming to clarify current capabilities and chart a path toward foundation models that perceive and reason about graphs like scientists do.

arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 12

GraphVerse: A Comprehensive Visual Graph Reasoning Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models

GraphVerse is a new benchmark for multimodal large language models that tests visual graph reasoning by combining perception, graph-based visual inputs, and multi-step reasoning. It introduces Graph-centric Image Editing strategies to actively challenge models while preserving semantics, and offers a VGR-Score metric that evaluates reasoning quality beyond simple answer accuracy. Experiments show current models have limitations in VGR and demonstrate the effectiveness of GraphVerse for broader multimodal reasoning tasks.

By Yuanfu Sun, Yuanhang Ren, Kang Li, Chuanhao Ji, Jiaxi Li, Jiajin Liu, Ninghao Liu, Qiaoyu Tan
arXiv AI
Aug 7

ViSR-KGC: Visual Subgraph Reasoning with Vision-Language Models for Multimodal Knowledge Graph Completion

arXiv:2608. 05833v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge graph completion (KGC) aims to infer missing entities or relations from incomplete graph structures, and has evolved into multimodal knowledge graph completion (MMKGC), where entities are associated with multiple modalities such as text and images.

By Jiafan Li, Mengxue Yang, Jiaqi Zhu, Liang Chang, Ying Li, Hongan Wang
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 22

One Model, Many Graphs: Learning over Attributed Graphs across Heterogeneous Modalities with Vision-Language Models

arXiv:2607. 19128v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) provide a unified representation space for textual and visual information, yet their potential as general-purpose backbones for graph-structured data remains largely unexplored.

By Jiayi Yang, Yifang Chen, Yuanfu Sun, Jiajin Liu, Qiaoyu Tan
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 17

What Do Temporal Graph Learning Models Learn?

arXiv:2510. 09416v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Learning on temporal graphs has become a central topic in graph representation learning, with numerous benchmarks indicating the strong performance of state-of-the-art models.

By Abigail J. Hayes, Tobias Schumacher, Markus Strohmaier
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 12

MVGraph: Benchmarking LVLMs on Evidence Composition across Multi-View Visual Graph

MVGraph is a new benchmark designed to evaluate large vision‑language models on multi‑graph reasoning tasks where evidence is spread across multiple interrelated visual graph views. It contains 8,000 instances covering eight graph‑theoretic tasks derived from partial and temporal graph scenarios, and each instance is provably unsolvable from a single view. The benchmark also offers 29 diagnostic tasks with 64,000 instances to probe four core capabilities—Perception, Alignment, Composition, and Reasoning—providing golden intermediate representations for detailed analysis.

By Yingjie Zhu, Han Cheng, Xuefeng Bai, Youcheng Pan, Yang Xiang, Kehai Chen
arXiv AI
Aug 26

ReactBench: A Benchmark for Topological Reasoning in MLLMs on Chemical Reaction Diagrams

ReactBench is a benchmark designed to evaluate the structural reasoning abilities of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) using chemical reaction diagrams. The dataset contains 1,618 expert‑annotated question‑answer pairs that test reasoning across four hierarchical task dimensions, from simple endpoint counting to complex topological analysis. Evaluation of 24 MLLMs shows a performance gap of more than 30% between anchor‑based tasks and holistic structural reasoning tasks, indicating that current models struggle with reasoning over branching, converging, and cyclic structures.

By Qiang Xu, Shengyuan Bai, Yu Wang, He Cao, Leqing Chen, Yuanyuan Liu, Bin Feng, Zijing Liu, Yu Li