arXiv Computation and Language By Yingjie Zhu, Han Cheng, Xuefeng Bai, Youcheng Pan, Yang Xiang, Kehai Chen

MVGraph: Benchmarking LVLMs on Evidence Composition across Multi-View Visual Graph

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

MVGraph is a new benchmark designed to evaluate large vision‑language models on multi‑graph reasoning tasks where evidence is spread across multiple interrelated visual graph views. It contains 8,000 instances covering eight graph‑theoretic tasks derived from partial and temporal graph scenarios, and each instance is provably unsolvable from a single view. The benchmark also offers 29 diagnostic tasks with 64,000 instances to probe four core capabilities—Perception, Alignment, Composition, and Reasoning—providing golden intermediate representations for detailed analysis.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Computer Vision
2d ago

GraphVerse: A Comprehensive Visual Graph Reasoning Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models

GraphVerse is a new benchmark for multimodal large language models that tests visual graph reasoning by combining perception, graph-based visual inputs, and multi-step reasoning. It introduces Graph-centric Image Editing strategies to actively challenge models while preserving semantics, and offers a VGR-Score metric that evaluates reasoning quality beyond simple answer accuracy. Experiments show current models have limitations in VGR and demonstrate the effectiveness of GraphVerse for broader multimodal reasoning tasks.

By Yuanfu Sun, Yuanhang Ren, Kang Li, Chuanhao Ji, Jiaxi Li, Jiajin Liu, Ninghao Liu, Qiaoyu Tan
arXiv AI
Sep 28

MVVBench: Benchmarking 4D Reasoning in Vision-Language Models

MVVBench is a new benchmark for multi‑view video reasoning that tests vision‑language models on tasks requiring integration of spatial and temporal evidence across multiple, often non‑overlapping camera streams. The benchmark contains questions that cannot be answered from any single view or single moment, forcing models to jointly reason across views and time. It evaluates six capabilities—including attribute identification, relative distance, camera pose, and compositional counting—and provides human‑authored QA, rigorous verification, and detailed error analysis. "whyItMatters":"The benchmark offers a rigorous evaluation of 4D multi‑view reasoning and a foundation for future progress toward reliable embodied perception."

By Hyungjin Chung, Byeongjun Park, Joonseok Lee, Hojun Kim, Jaeho Choi, Byung-Hoon Kim
arXiv AI
Aug 14

Unified Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Complex Graph Reasoning in Large Language Models

arXiv:2608. 12391v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Graph reasoning provides a promising testbed for evaluating the reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs), as graph instances can be programmatically generated, structurally controlled, and naturally scaled to long-input settings.

By Fali Wang, Ali Al-Lawati, Iliyas Bektas, Jinxuan Fang, Alek Melenski, Tianxiang Zhao, Yao Ma, Suhang Wang
arXiv AI
Aug 7

ViSR-KGC: Visual Subgraph Reasoning with Vision-Language Models for Multimodal Knowledge Graph Completion

arXiv:2608. 05833v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge graph completion (KGC) aims to infer missing entities or relations from incomplete graph structures, and has evolved into multimodal knowledge graph completion (MMKGC), where entities are associated with multiple modalities such as text and images.

By Jiafan Li, Mengxue Yang, Jiaqi Zhu, Liang Chang, Ying Li, Hongan Wang
arXiv AI
Jun 10

V-REX: Benchmarking Exploratory Visual Reasoning via Chain-of-Questions

arXiv:2512. 11995v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: While many vision-language models (VLMs) are developed to answer well-defined, straightforward questions with highly specified targets, as in most benchmarks, they often struggle in practice with complex open-ended tasks, which usually require multiple rounds of exploration and reasoning in the visual space.

By Chenrui Fan, Yijun Liang, Shweta Bhardwaj, Kwesi Cobbina, Ming Li, Tianyi Zhou