Embodied intelligence and world models require video understanding systems to go beyond recognizing objects and actions and develop an understanding of physical regularities. However, despite their strong performance on general video understanding tasks, current video-language models still struggle to reliably determine whether an observed event conforms to specific physical laws.
Video generation models are increasingly capable of producing realistic videos, but they still struggle to generate videos that follow basic physical laws. Compounding this is a lack of reliable granular evaluation methods for localizing and specifying physical law violations in videos.
arXiv:2607. 10190v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Video-language models (VLMs) have achieved remarkable performance on video understanding and visual question answering, yet they remain unreliable in reasoning about physical plausibility, where understanding object interactions, causal dynamics, and fundamental physical principles is essential.
By Wenyuan Wang, Lianyu Hu, Hao Wang, Yang Liu
arXiv:2605.04515v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Video Large Language Models (Video-LLMs) excel in general video understanding but often base physical judgments on event expectations rather than o...
By Zicheng Zhao, Chaofan Gan, Shijie Li, Weiyao Lin
arXiv:2609.38377v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Evaluating the physical consistency of generated videos remains a fundamental challenge. Existing approaches rely on off-the-shelf vision-language mode...
By Max Ku, Jiaojiao Fan, Zekun Hao, Francesco Ferroni, Heng Wang, Wenhu Chen, Ming-Yu Liu, Prithvijit Chattopadhyay
The paper argues that current embodied vision‑language planning benchmarks favor linguistic next‑token prediction over physically grounded next‑state reasoning, leading models to rely on language priors rather than true causal dependencies. To address this, the authors introduce Causal‑Plan‑Bench, a diagnostic suite covering four causal dimensions, and Causal‑Plan‑1M, a million‑scale corpus of explicit causal reasoning traces extracted from egocentric videos. Extensive experiments show that existing models perform poorly on these tasks, while a new model trained with a tailored recipe—Causal Planner based on Qwen3‑VL‑8B—achieves significant gains, demonstrating the feasibility of physically grounded causal reasoning.
By Zheng Lu, Mingqi Gao, Qinlei Xie, Wanqi Zhong, Hanwen Cui, Zirui Song, Lijie Wang, Chong Luo, Bei Liu, Yiming Li
PhysVista is a new benchmark that evaluates physical intelligence in Vision‑Language Models (VLMs) by integrating perception, reasoning, and plausibility assessment into a closed cognitive loop. It distinguishes between event‑level and scale‑level reasoning and tests models on both real‑world and AI‑generated videos to provide a holistic, fine‑grained analysis of physical understanding. Experiments show significant gaps in VLMs’ physical reasoning and plausibility assessment, underscoring the need for more principled, physically grounded multimodal designs.
By Xinge Peng, Yiting Lu, Tianwu Zhi, Wen Wen, Jianzhao Liu, Xin Li, Zhibo Chen
arXiv:2606. 18586v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Physical events are not understood by their names alone, but by the causal state changes that compose them.
By Shang Wu, Haoran Lu, Songling Liu, Chenwei Xu, Lie Lu, Pranav Maneriker, Fan Du, Manling Li, Zhaoran Wang, Han Liu
The paper introduces REVEAL, a diagnostic benchmark that stresses Video‑Language Models (VidLMs) on five controlled probes—camera‑motion sensitivity, cross‑frame integration, video sycophancy, language‑only shortcuts, and temporal expectation bias—to assess how well these models encode and use visual evidence. Experiments on 12 VidLMs reveal systematic failures: some visual signals are never reliably encoded, while others are overridden by model priors, leading to performance below chance on several probes that humans solve with high accuracy. Mechanistic probes further pinpoint where and why visual evidence is lost, demonstrating that under assertive prompts a model’s output becomes nearly invariant to real versus random video input, rendering visual evidence causally inert.
By Sethuraman T V, Savya Khosla, Aditi Tiwari, Vidya Ganesh, Rakshana Jayaprakash, Aditya Jain, Vignesh Srinivasakumar, Onkar Kishor Susladkar, Srinidhi Sunkara, Aditya Shanmugham, Rakesh Vaideeswaran, Abbaas Alif Mohamed Nishar, Simon Jenni, Rohan Maheshwari, Derek Hoiem
arXiv:2609.40358v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Video world models are expected to predict how the physical world evolves, yet they often produce visually plausible videos that violate basic physical...
By Liming Lu, Xianzheng Ma, Wenkun He, Guanqi Zhan, Yilin Zhao, Junyu Chen, Mengyao Xu, Jiaojiao Fan, Wenhang Ge, Yuchao Gu, Yunze Liu, Boyi Li, Zhen Dong, Victor Prisacariu, Ming-Yu Liu, Song Han, Han Cai
arXiv:2607. 02551v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Video multimodal large language models have made strong progress on open-ended video understanding, but they still lack precise local spatiotemporal perception.
By Yankai Yang, Yancheng Long, Bin Wen, Fan Yang, Tingting Gao, Han Li, Shuo Yang
arXiv:2607. 11862v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Current Video Large Language Models (Video LLMs) excel in question answering (QA) but largely operate as black boxes, providing textual answers without verifiable visual grounding.
By Shijie Wang, Honglu Zhou, Ziyang Wang, Ran Xu, Caiming Xiong, Silvio Savarese, Chen Sun, Juan Carlos Niebles