Video generation models are increasingly capable of producing realistic videos, but they still struggle to generate videos that follow basic physical laws. Compounding this is a lack of reliable granular evaluation methods for localizing and specifying physical law violations in videos.
arXiv:2607. 11862v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Current Video Large Language Models (Video LLMs) excel in question answering (QA) but largely operate as black boxes, providing textual answers without verifiable visual grounding.
arXiv:2608. 02150v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Embodied intelligence and world models require video understanding systems to go beyond recognizing objects and actions and develop an understanding of physical regularities.
Embodied intelligence and world models require video understanding systems to go beyond recognizing objects and actions and develop an understanding of physical regularities. However, despite their strong performance on general video understanding tasks, current video-language models still struggle to reliably determine whether an observed event conforms to specific physical laws.
arXiv:2602. 00593v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Despite progress on general tasks, vision-language models (VLMs) still struggle with challenges that demand both fine-grained visual grounding and external knowledge, a synergy overlooked by existing benchmarks that evaluate these abilities in isolation.
arXiv:2607. 01086v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The evaluation of long-term video quality understanding remains an open challenge for large vision-language models (LVLMs).
arXiv:2606. 01485v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We describe our submission to the VRR Challenge @ CVPR 2026, built on the \emph{ImplicitQA} / \emph{VRR-QA} benchmark~\cite{implicitqa}: multiple-choice video question answering in which answers are deliberately \emph{not} observable in any single frame and must be inferred from spatial layout, motion, depth, viewpoint, causality, and social context across discontinuous frames of creative video.
arXiv:2604.01569v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Video multimodal large language models achieve strong results on existing benchmarks, but answer accuracy alone does not establish whether they can...
VTR-Bench is a new benchmark designed to evaluate how well video generation models render text within scenes. It includes 300 prompts across five real-world scenarios such as advertisements and scientific videos, and uses an automated pipeline with human alignment to assess text fidelity and scene/motion requirements. Experiments on 11 state‑of‑the‑art models show that even the best performer has a word error rate of 0.250, underscoring widespread challenges in visual text rendering.
arXiv:2608.21839v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reliable reward models are essential for text-to-video evaluation and alignment. However, the trade-off between evaluation accuracy and inference effic...
arXiv:2609.38377v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating the physical consistency of generated videos remains a fundamental challenge. Existing approaches rely on off-the-shelf vision-language mode...
The paper introduces a causal and temporal evaluation framework for vision‑language models (VLMs) that tracks how visual input, question text, and generated prefixes influence autoregressive decoding. It defines three step‑indexed causal‑drive metrics—Visual Causal Drive (VCD), Question Causal Drive (QCD), and Prefix Causal Drive (PCD)—using a Structural Causal Model and interventions. Experiments on Qwen3‑VL‑8B‑Instruct and other datasets show a shift from early question and visual guidance to increased reliance on generated prefixes, and demonstrate that QCD and PCD reduce recovery error and improve bias detection.