arXiv AI

The Capability Manifold and ML Scaling Laws

The paper introduces a capability manifold, a multidimensional framework that maps downstream capabilities—such as reasoning, retrieval, planning, and adaptation—to pre‑training, post‑training, and test‑time resources via bounded scaling functions. It provides analytical Jacobians to quantify how sensitive each capability is to changes in resources and their interactions. By embedding existing Kaplan‑ and Chinchilla‑type scaling laws and test‑time compute into this manifold, the authors demonstrate that these scaling relationships can be unified as trajectories on a common capability manifold.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 4

SuperValid: Capability-Aligned OOD Validation for Generalizable Downstream Scaling

The paper introduces SuperValid, a framework that generates out-of-distribution, capability-aligned validation data by distilling core concepts from benchmarks and expanding them into diverse, knowledge-rich texts. By focusing on capability-level performance rather than benchmark-specific metrics, SuperValid’s loss correlates strongly and stably with downstream benchmark results across a wide range of models, scales, and training data distributions. This training‑free metric can be computed during training, enabling model selection, early stopping, and scaling decisions without the need for benchmark evaluation.

By Quanen Sun, Changxin Tian, Ke Shi, Cai Chen, Cunyin Peng, Jia Liu, Kunlong Chen, Zhiqiang Zhang, Jun Zhou
arXiv AI
Sep 16

Autonomous Assessment of Generalizability of AI Agent Capabilities

The paper introduces Monte Carlo Query Search (MCQS), an active query‑synthesis method for learning symbolic stochastic capability models of black‑box AI agents. MCQS treats capability evaluation as an active learning problem over policies, using Monte Carlo tree search to generate queries that distinguish between pessimistic and optimistic capability hypotheses. Experiments demonstrate that MCQS learns accurate capability models more efficiently than baseline strategies, enabling systematic characterization of agent capability boundaries with fewer interactions.

By Daniel Bramblett, Rushang Karia, Adrian Ciotinga, Pulkit Verma, YooJung Choi, Siddharth Srivastava
arXiv AI
Aug 25

What Transfers from Text to Vision? Capability Scaling Laws and Transfer Dynamics for VLMs

The paper introduces the Capability-Driven Multimodal Scaling Law, a cross-family framework that predicts vision-language model (VLM) benchmark accuracy from a low-dimensional textual capability score extracted via PCA. By training over 150 VLMs on 34 large language models across seven families, the authors demonstrate that the law accurately extrapolates transfer rates from 8B to 72B‑parameter backbones, predicts full training trajectories, and generalizes to unseen model families. The study also reveals actionable insights, such as certain textual benchmarks negatively correlating with multimodal performance and base LLMs outperforming instruction-tuned counterparts as VLM backbones due to higher absorption rates.

By Ziran Li, Qiang Wang, Zhengyu Chen, Shanglin Lei, Borun Chen, Jingang Wang, Xunliang Cai
arXiv AI
2d ago

Capabilities Ain't All You Need: Measuring Propensities in AI

The paper introduces a formal framework for measuring AI propensities—tendencies of models to exhibit particular behaviours—using a bilogistic formulation that identifies an "ideal band" of success probability. It estimates the limits of this band with task‑agnostic rubrics and applies the method to six families of LLMs, showing how shifts in propensity affect task performance. The study finds that propensity estimates from one benchmark predict behaviour on held‑out tasks and that combining propensity with capability metrics yields stronger predictive power than either alone.

By Daniel Romero-Alvarado, Fernando Mart\'inez-Plumed, Lorenzo Pacchiardi, Hugo Save, Siddhesh Milind Pawar, Behzad Mehrbakhsh, Pablo Antonio Moreno Casares, Ben Slater, Paolo Bova, Peter Romero, Zachary R. Tidler, Jonathan Prunty, Luning Sun, Jose Hernandez-Orallo
arXiv AI
Jun 2

Comprehensive AI governance requires addressing non-model gains

arXiv:2606. 00047v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Frontier AI governance often centres on the model-level governance paradigm, which assumes that a model's capability profile is primarily a function of the compute and data used during training.

By Arthur Goemans, Dan Altman, Noemi Dreksler, Jonas Freund, Milan Gandhi, Zhengdong Wang, Sarah Cogan, Sebastien Krier, Demetra Brady, Lewis Ho, Allan Dafoe
arXiv AI
Aug 17

Don't Claim Benchmark-Oriented Optimization Improves General Coding Capability -- Diverse Evaluation Is Required

arXiv:2608. 13566v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Post-training papers, model cards, and blog posts often treat scores on a small set of coding benchmarks (e.

By Egor Shibaev, Vera Kudrevskaia, Timur Galimzyanov, Mikhail Evtikhiev, Ana Terna, Rastislav Rabatin, Timur Kudashev, Timofey Bryksin, Arina Puchkova, Patrik Bartak, Egor Bogomolov, Sergey Titov
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 19

Agents unlock new capabilities through Switching LoRA Adapters as a Tool (SLAaaT)

The paper introduces Switching LoRA Adapters as a Tool (SLAaaT), a method that lets agents dynamically switch between specialized LoRA adapters during a trajectory. By applying this to two synthetic coding tasks, the authors show that agents can solve problems they previously failed, autonomously select strategies that outperform a human heuristic, and reduce the capability tax by up to 18× compared to using a single adapter. SLAaaT also outperforms spawning subagents in both task performance and token efficiency.

By Kenneth Ge