arXiv Machine Learning

Interleaved Speech Language Models Latently Work In Text

arXiv AI
Aug 25

Do Spoken Language Models Hear Speech as They Read Text? Bridging Structural Gaps Between Speech and Text

The paper investigates how Spoken Language Models (SLMs) process speech compared to text, noting that current SLMs show weak alignment between speech and text representations despite strong downstream performance. The authors propose a framework that separates length mismatch from semantic alignment to better match speech and text representations. Experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that this approach yields competitive results against strong baselines, highlighting the need to explicitly address structural differences between speech and text in SLM training.

By Hyeonyu Kim, Hwayeon Kim, Youngwon Choi, Myeongkyun Cho, Huu-Kim Nguyen
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 28

SPAR-K: Scheduled Periodic Alternating Early Exit for Spoken Language Models

SPAR-K is a scheduled periodic alternating early‑exit framework for interleaved spoken language models that reduces decoding depth for speech tokens while maintaining quality. It lets most speech positions exit at a fixed intermediate layer and inserts periodic full‑depth refresh steps to counter distribution shift. Experiments on Step‑Audio‑2‑mini and GLM‑4‑Voice show up to 11 % depth reduction with less than 0.82 % drop in question‑answering accuracy and negligible impact on MOS and WER.

By Hsiao-Ying Huang, Cheng-Han Chiang, Hung-yi Lee
arXiv AI
Sep 4

Listen to the Latents: Self-Correcting Speech Recognition in Large Audio Language Models Through Hidden-State Interactions

The paper introduces Hybrid Search, a method that refines warm-initialized large language model (LLM) based automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems by exploiting interactions between ASR hidden states and the base LLM’s hidden states. By identifying tokens with high semantic dependence and selectively correcting them, the approach surpasses traditional global LLM‑correction techniques such as rescoring and late fusion. The study demonstrates that even after warm initialization, LLM‑based ASR models can further benefit from their base LLM during inference.

By Chan-Jan Hsu, Jaeyeon Kim, Chao-Han Huck Yang, Shinji Watanabe, Hung-yi Lee, Carlos Busso
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 28

When Is Noise Response Universal? Tokenization as the Hidden Variable in Language Models

The study investigates how textual neural models degrade when inputs contain noise such as typos, OCR errors, or dropped words. It finds that model performance decline is largely consistent across architectures under word‑level noise but diverges under character‑level noise, a difference attributed to tokenization rather than architecture. By applying a short contrastive training recipe, diverse encoders converge to a common robustness curve, enabling prediction of a model’s noise resilience and the ability to enhance robustness at specific noise scales through targeted training.

By Yefan Tao, Gerald Friedland, Luyang Kong