arXiv:2603. 12507v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Minimising a spectral risk objective, defined as a weighted combination of expected cost and Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR), is challenging when the uncertainty distribution is decision-dependent, making both surrogate modelling and simulation-based ranking sensitive to tail estimation error.
By Marcell T. Kurbucz
arXiv:2610.18434v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Expected improvement based on stochastic kriging (SK) surrogate is widely used in continuous simulation optimization, but unknown heterosceda...
By Songhao Wang, Jianglin Xia, Haowei Wang, Szu Hui Ng
The paper introduces a learning-based surrogate approach for stochastic optimization problems where uncertainty depends on the decision, modeled via a nonparametric regression. It constructs a surrogate that embeds iteratively updated Jacobian estimates, using an adaptive random design that focuses sampling near the current iterate to achieve dimension‑independent convergence of the Jacobian estimates. The resulting learning‑based stochastic prox‑linear (L‑SPL) algorithm demonstrates nonasymptotic convergence rates and outperforms existing methods in sample efficiency and objective value in numerical experiments.
By Boyang Shen, Junyi Liu
The paper studies distributionally robust ranking and selection (DRR&S), where the goal is to identify the best alternative under input uncertainty by considering multiple plausible input distributions. It introduces the concept of sequential additivity, showing that efficient sampling should focus on a small, additive set of critical scenarios rather than a multiplicative number. The authors prove an algorithm‑independent lower bound on sampling, design an additive allocation (AA) procedure that meets this bound and achieves exponentially decreasing error probability, and extend the approach to a general additive allocation (GAA) framework that incorporates traditional R&S sampling rules.
By Zaile Li, Yuchen Wan, L. Jeff Hong
arXiv:2601. 07094v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Bayesian optimization (BO) iteratively fits a Gaussian process (GP) surrogate to accumulated evaluations and selects new queries via an acquisition function.
By Jiguang Li, Hengrui Luo
arXiv:2606. 26975v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Empirical Bayes (EB) estimators can match the first-order asymptotic risk of maximum likelihood (ML) while behaving very differently at second order: recent excess mean squared error (XMSE) analysis shows that kernel-based EB estimation may be worse than ML when the kernel is poorly aligned with the true parameter.
By Minghao Chen, Jiale Zheng
arXiv:2606. 04342v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multi-step time series forecasting (MSF) is commonly evaluated using point-wise error metrics such as mean squared error (MSE), implicitly treating the conditional mean as a sufficient target.
By Riku Green, Zahraa S. Abdallah, Telmo M Silva Filho
arXiv:2610.19027v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Chance-constrained stochastic programs (CCSPs) require solutions that satisfy uncertain constraints with high probability. Standard approaches either...
By Justin Dumouchelle, Shunyu Yao, Beste Basciftci, Thiago Serra
HyperMC is a multi‑fidelity hyperparameter tuning framework for stochastic gradient Markov chain Monte Carlo (SGMCMC) that combines Hyperband-style resource allocation with kernel Stein discrepancy (KSD) evaluation. It uses successive‑halving brackets to explore a continuous hyperparameter space while progressively refining promising configurations within a fixed computational budget. Robust HyperMC further introduces global grid initialization and elite‑guided local refinement to reduce sensitivity to random candidate generation and noisy evaluations, and theoretical analysis shows that the successive‑halving component selects a near‑optimal configuration with high probability under suitable conditions.
By Ming Tan, Xiyun Jiao
arXiv:2605. 20145v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Gaussian process (GP) predictive distributions are commonly used in Bayesian optimization (BO) to guide the selection of evaluation points for expensive objective functions.
By Aur\'elien Pion, Emmanuel Vazquez
arXiv:2209. 01754v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The empirical risk minimization approach to data-driven decision making requires access to training data drawn under the same conditions as those that will be faced when the decision rule is deployed.
By Roshni Sahoo, Lihua Lei, Stefan Wager
arXiv:2605. 07565v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We study Bayesian Optimisation (BO) in settings where the objective function is influenced by uncontrollable environmental contexts governed by an unknown probability distribution.
By Tigran Ramazyan, Denis Derkach