Debias‑SparseGPT is a post‑training pruning technique that adds a representational debiasing term based on demographically contrasting inputs to mitigate bias amplification caused by weight sparsification. The method is validated across various generative LLMs and sparsity levels (25%, 50%, and structured 2:4), consistently reducing pruning‑induced bias while maintaining perplexity and zero‑shot accuracy. In the most aggressive 2:4 sparsity regime, enriching the calibration set with long‑context, content‑rich examples further improves both downstream performance and fairness.
arXiv:2311.04902v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) with billions of parameters are prime targets for network pruning, which removes some model weights without hurt...
Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are commonly used to interpret large language models, but their reliability after pruning is unclear. This study shows that pruning’s effect on an SAE is governed by perturbation energy, a covariance-weighted norm, and that magnitude pruning distorts the representation space by ignoring activation geometry. Activation-aware pruning methods such as Wanda and SparseGPT better preserve SAE behavior, and the authors find that middle layers are especially vulnerable, leading them to propose a layer‑wise sparsity allocation that reduces perplexity for a given sparsity level.
Modern large language models are pretrained on massive datasets, making it difficult to prevent benchmark data from entering their training sets and undermining the reliability of evaluation results....
arXiv:2609.27510v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern large language models are pretrained on massive datasets, making it difficult to prevent benchmark data from entering their training sets and...
arXiv:2504.04342v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Scaling up model parameters and training data consistently improves the performance of large language models (LLMs), but at the cost of rapidly gro...
arXiv:2603. 13418v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Structured pruning is widely applied to compress large language models (LLMs), but its performance depends heavily on how neuron importance is estimated.
arXiv:2510. 00192v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) has become a widely used paradigm for parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large language models, yet its representational capacity often lags behind full fine-tuning.
arXiv:2608. 06630v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Pruning reduces the inference cost of large language models, but existing criteria primarily preserve large activations or reconstruct layer outputs.
The paper introduces ZipCal, a model‑agnostic data curation method that selects calibration data for post‑training compression of large language models by maximizing lexical diversity using Zipfian power laws. ZipCal outperforms uniform random sampling on pruning benchmarks and matches a state‑of‑the‑art perplexity‑based approach while being roughly 240× faster due to its linear complexity. The authors provide code and experiments at their GitHub repository.
arXiv:2509. 14230v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: While structured pruning presents a highly effective pathway for accelerating Large Language Model (LLM) inference, existing methods frequently suffer from significant performance degradation and demand computationally retraining to recover capabilities.
arXiv:2507. 01900v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Pruning is a highly effective approach for compressing large language models (LLMs), significantly reducing inference latency.
arXiv:2602. 01997v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent work has shown that layer pruning can effectively compress large language models (LLMs) while retaining strong performance on classification benchmarks, often with little or no finetuning.