arXiv:2504.04342v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Scaling up model parameters and training data consistently improves the performance of large language models (LLMs), but at the cost of rapidly gro...
By Ayan Sengupta, Siddhant Chaudhary, Tanmoy Chakraborty
arXiv:2502. 07780v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved significant success across various NLP tasks.
By Shengkun Tang, Oliver Sieberling, Eldar Kurtic, Zhiqiang Shen, Dan Alistarh
arXiv:2509. 14230v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: While structured pruning presents a highly effective pathway for accelerating Large Language Model (LLM) inference, existing methods frequently suffer from significant performance degradation and demand computationally retraining to recover capabilities.
By Mengting Ai, Tianxin Wei, Sirui Chen, Jingrui He
arXiv:2606. 07819v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recently, the efficiency of Large Language Models (LLMs) deployment has become a critical concern in practical applications.
By Hoang-Loc La, Truong-Thanh Le, Amir Taherkordi, Phuong Hoai Ha
arXiv:2609.12475v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Comprehensive benchmark suites are essential for improving large language models (LLMs), but many widely used benchmarks are redundant, making evaluati...
By Zhongzhan Huang, Junxin Li, Guoming Ling, Yupei Lin, Shanshan Zhong, Hefeng Wu
Debias‑SparseGPT is a post‑training pruning technique that adds a representational debiasing term based on demographically contrasting inputs to mitigate bias amplification caused by weight sparsification. The method is validated across various generative LLMs and sparsity levels (25%, 50%, and structured 2:4), consistently reducing pruning‑induced bias while maintaining perplexity and zero‑shot accuracy. In the most aggressive 2:4 sparsity regime, enriching the calibration set with long‑context, content‑rich examples further improves both downstream performance and fairness.
By Irina Proskurina, Guillaume Metzler, Antoine Gourru, Julien Velcin