arXiv:2601.06787v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are known to contain significant redundancy, yet a systematic explanation for why certain components, particularly in...
By Jaewon Sok, Jewon Yeom, Seonghyeon Park, Jeongjae Park, Taesup Kim
arXiv:2504. 21174v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Deep learning drives a new wave in computing systems and triggers the automation of increasingly complex problems.
By Leandro Giusti Mugnaini, Bruno Lopes Yamamoto, Lucas Lauton de Alcantara, Victor Zacarias, Edson Bollis, Lucas Pellicer, Anna Helena Reali Costa, Artur Jordao
arXiv:2605. 18331v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have experienced significant growth and development in recent years.
By Diego Coello de Portugal Mecke, Tom Hanika, Lars Schmidth-Thieme
arXiv:2509. 14230v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: While structured pruning presents a highly effective pathway for accelerating Large Language Model (LLM) inference, existing methods frequently suffer from significant performance degradation and demand computationally retraining to recover capabilities.
By Mengting Ai, Tianxin Wei, Sirui Chen, Jingrui He
arXiv:2512.20636v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Many self-attention sublayers in large language models (LLMs) can be removed with little to no loss. We attribute this to the Attention Suppr...
By Dhananjay Saikumar, Blesson Varghese
arXiv:2606. 19150v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The remarkable success of Transformer-based models in natural language processing stems from architectural scaling, which leads to a large number of parameters and hinders deployment in resource-constrained environments.
By Yaniv Livertovsky, Shahar Somin, Gonen Singer
arXiv:2504.04342v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Scaling up model parameters and training data consistently improves the performance of large language models (LLMs), but at the cost of rapidly gro...
By Ayan Sengupta, Siddhant Chaudhary, Tanmoy Chakraborty
The paper shows that only a small subset of attention heads in vision-language models is responsible for selecting critical visual tokens. By pruning tokens based on similarity before LLM reasoning and then applying head‑aware pruning during reasoning, the proposed ProViP framework achieves high task performance with significant speedups. Experiments on LLaVA‑1.5‑7B demonstrate 95.9% performance retention and a 1.62× inference speedup at an 88.9% pruning ratio.
By Chaofang Ma, Lin Jiang, Carol Jingyi Li, Xingyu Liu, Zeyu Li, Jiang Xu, Wei Zhang
arXiv:2606. 24970v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Pruning Large Language Models (LLMs) reduces memory and inference costs by removing parts of the network, producing smaller models that retain most of their accuracy.
By Pietro Tropeano, Maria Maistro, Tuukka Ruotsalo, Christina Lioma
arXiv:2607. 22587v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) achieve strong performance across diverse tasks but their deployment is constrained by the memory and compute cost of their parameters.
By Manel Kara laoua, Soumia Bouyahiaoui, Aicha Boutorh
arXiv:2602. 01997v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent work has shown that layer pruning can effectively compress large language models (LLMs) while retaining strong performance on classification benchmarks, often with little or no finetuning.
By Safal Shrestha, Anubhav Shrestha, Minwu Kim, Aadim Nepal, Keith Ross
The paper introduces STD, a hierarchical token pruning framework for Large Vision‑Language Models that aligns pruning strategies with the functional roles of different network stages. By using high‑frequency spectral analysis in shallow layers, Gaussian‑smoothed attention in intermediate layers, and a stability‑adaptive trigger in deep layers, STD preserves essential visual information while aggressively reducing token counts. Experiments demonstrate that STD outperforms existing pruning methods, achieving up to 94.4% token reduction and a 3.9× speed‑up on LLaVA‑NeXT‑7B.
By Shuo Zhang, Jintao Tong, Yixiong Zou, Yuhua Li, Ruixuan Li