arXiv AI
Jun 18
Target-confidence Recourse Using tSeTlin machines: TRUST
arXiv:2606. 18832v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Counterfactual explanations are widely used to provide algorithmic recourse in high-stakes decision-making systems.
Target-confidence Recourse Using tSeTlin machines: TRUST
Counterfactual explanations are widely used to provide algorithmic recourse in high-stakes decision-making systems. Most existing methods seek the smallest change to an input that flips a model's decision.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 6
Diverse and Plausible Algorithmic Recourse via Tractable Recourse Distributions
arXiv:2608. 04677v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Algorithmic recourse seeks to help individuals reverse unfavorable automated decisions by recommending actionable changes that achieve a desired outcome.
arXiv AI
Jun 9
Agentic Search for Counterfactual Recourse under Fixed LLM Budgets
arXiv:2606. 08696v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Counterfactual recourse aims to provide actionable feature changes that would alter an unfavorable decision made by a predictive model.
arXiv AI
Jun 15
Capability Minimization as a Safety Primitive: Risk-Aware Causal Gating for Least-Privilege LLM Agents
arXiv:2606. 13884v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern decision systems increasingly rely on learned components whose outputs may be confident yet wrong, exposing downstream actions to costly errors.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 3
Prediction Sets for Counterfactual Decisions: Coverage, Optimality, and Conformal Prediction
arXiv:2607. 02206v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Predictions are increasingly used to guide high-stakes decisions, from treatment selection to policy making.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 27
CEL: Comprehensive Counterfactual Explanations Library and Benchmark
arXiv:2607. 22045v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Counterfactual explanations are a prominent approach in explainable artificial intelligence (xAI), providing actionable guidance on what input changes would alter a model's prediction to a desired outcome.
arXiv AI
Jun 2
Evidence-Gated LLM Priors for Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization
arXiv:2606. 01730v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as heuristic advisors for black-box optimization, yet their suggestions and self-reported confidence are not necessarily calibrated to downstream objective values.
arXiv AI
Jul 14
YUKTI: From Natural-Language Situations to Robust, Verifiable Decisions An Uncertainty-Typed Proposition IR, Assumption-Robust Pareto Frontiers, and a Regret Certificate
arXiv:2607. 09706v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language models turn a worded situation into a numeric plan, and the dominant pipelines (NL4Opt, OptiMUS, ORLM, OR-LLM-Agent) commit to a single objective and point-valued coefficients, then solve once.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 10
Beyond Explaining Predictions: Logic-Based Explanations for Confidence in Machine Learning Models
arXiv:2606. 10347v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine learning is increasingly used in critical domains, where both predictions and their associated confidence levels influence important decisions.
arXiv AI
Jun 9
The ACUTE Protocol: Operationalizing Language Model Activations for Better Calibration, Utility, and Trust
arXiv:2606. 07822v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As language models improve and become increasingly deployed to solve a variety of tasks, trustworthiness becomes essential.
arXiv AI
Jun 30
Safety from Honesty in a Disinterested AI Predictor
arXiv:2606. 29657v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As AI systems become more capable, training procedures that optimize for downstream outcomes risk introducing implicit agency: goal-directed behavior that designers never specified.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 1
Evidence-Gated LLM Priors for Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as heuristic advisors for black-box optimization, yet their suggestions and self-reported confidence are not necessarily calibrated to downstream objective values. This issue becomes more pronounced in multi-objective Bayesian optimization, where different objectives may require different expert knowledge and where an LLM expert can be useful for one objective but misleading for another.